Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jun 13;7(11):2449-2458.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009145.

Polatuzumab vedotin with infusional chemotherapy for untreated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Polatuzumab vedotin with infusional chemotherapy for untreated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas

Ryan C Lynch et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

The POLARIX trial demonstrated the superiority of polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) over vincristine in the rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen for large B-cell lymphomas, but it is unknown whether Pola can be safely incorporated into intensified regimens (eg, dose-adjusted [DA]-EPOCH-R [etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab]) typically used for the highest risk histologies. This was a single-center, open-label, prospective clinical trial of 6 cycles of Pola-DA-EPCH-R (vincristine omitted) in aggressive large B-cell lymphomas. The primary end point was to estimate the safety of Pola-DA-EPCH-R as measured by the rate of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 2 cycles with prespecified suspension rules. Secondary and exploratory end points included efficacy and correlation with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels. We enrolled 18 patients on study, and with only 3 DLTs observed, the study met its primary end point for safety. There were 5 serious adverse events, including grade 3 febrile neutropenia (3, 17%), grade 3 colonic perforation in the setting of diverticulitis, and grade 5 sepsis/typhlitis. Among 17 evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 76%. With a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 12-month event-free survival was 72%, and 12-month overall survival was 94%. No patient with undetectable ctDNA at the end of treatment has relapsed to date. Using Pola to replace vincristine in the DA-EPOCH-R regimen met its primary safety end point. These data support the further evaluation and use of this approach in histologies where the potential benefit of both an intensified regimen and Pola may be desired. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04231877.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: R.C.L. received research funding from TG Therapeutics, Incyte, Bayer, Cyteir, Genentech, Seagen, and Rapt and provided consultancy to the Cancer Study Group and Seagen. C.S.U. provided consultancy to Genentech. S.D.S. received research funding from ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Ayala (spouse), Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb (spouse), De Novo Biopharma, Enterome, Genentech, Ignyta (spouse), Incyte Corporation, Kymera Therapeutics, Merck & Co, MorphoSys, Nanjing Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd, Portola Pharmaceuticals, and Viracta Therapeutics and provided consultancy or is on the advisory boards for ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Epizyme, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Incyte, Numab Therapeutics AG, AbbVie, and Coherus BioSciences (spouse). M. Shadman provides consultancy to and is a member of advisory boards, and steering committees or data safety monitoring committees for AbbVie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Sound Biologics, Pharmacyclics, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, MorphoSys/Incyte, TG Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Kite Pharma, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Epizyme, Eli Lilly, Adaptimmune, Mustang Bio, Regeneron, Merck, Fate Therapeutics, MEI Pharma, and Atara Biotherapeutics and received research funding from Mustang Bio, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Genentech, AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Sunesis, Atara Biotherapeutics, Genmab, MorphoSys/Incyte, and Vincerx. D.M.K. reports PhasED-seq patent; founder, consultancy, and equity for Foresight Diagnostics; and consultancy for Genentech and Roche. A.A.A. reports ownership interest in CiberMed, FortySeven Inc, and Foresight Diagnostics; patent filings related to cancer biomarkers; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene; and paid consultancies from Genentech, Karyopharm, Roche, Chugai, Gilead, and Celgene. J.J.C. reports PhasED-seq patent and founder, employment, and equity with Foresight Diagnostics. G.J.H. reports employment and equity with Foresight Diagnostics and equity with Freenome. A.S. reports employment and equity with Foresight Diagnostics. A.K.G. received research funding from Merck & Co, I-Mab Biopharma, IGM Bio, Takeda, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Agios, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Seagen, Teva, Genmab; consultancy and honoraria from Incyte, Kite, MorphoSys/Incyte, ADCT, Acrotech, Merck & Co, Karyopharm, Servier, BeiGene, Cellectar, Janssen, Seagen, Epizyme, I-Mab Biopharma, Gilead, Genentech, Lilly, Caribou, and Fresenius-Kabi; and equity ownership in Compliment Corporation. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Heat map displaying each patient by histology, age, and gender with each column displaying the chemotherapy dose level achieved by cycle. ∗ indicates that patient had a platelet nadir <25 000 cells per μL requiring dose reduction to DL1. ∗∗ indicates that patient had a grade 3 colonic perforation in the setting of diverticulitis requiring interruption of chemotherapy for surgery. The subsequent cycle was delayed 12 days and dose level decreased to DL1 as discretion of investigator while maintaining the standard Pola dose. ∗∗∗ indicates that patient died of sepsis during cycle 1. F, female; M, male.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) EFS for the overall study population for the start of therapy. (B) OS for overall study population from the start of therapy. (C) EFS stratified by interim PET results. (D) EFS stratified by EOT PET results. (E) Spider plot of ctDNA allele frequency from start of therapy through EOT stratified by patients with or without known progressive disease. (F) EFS stratified by detection of ctDNA at the EOT.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Landmark analysis of EFS from time of ctDNA analysis including early molecular response (EMR) (A), major molecular response (MMR) (B), and EOT ctDNA clearance (C).

References

    1. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(4):235–242. - PubMed
    1. Pfreundschuh M, Schubert J, Ziepert M, et al. Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60) Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(2):105–116. - PubMed
    1. Pfreundschuh M, Kuhnt E, Trumper L, et al. CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: 6-year results of an open-label randomised study of the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(11):1013–1022. - PubMed
    1. Nowakowski GS, Chiappella A, Gascoyne RD, et al. ROBUST: a phase III study of lenalidomide plus R-CHOP versus placebo plus R-CHOP in previously untreated patients with ABC-type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(12):1317–1328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leonard JP, Kolibaba KS, Reeves JA, et al. Randomized phase II study of R-CHOP with or without bortezomib in previously untreated patients with non–germinal center B-cell–like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(31):3538–3546. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data