Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jul;94(1):260-267.
doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02419-8. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

Pre-pandemic support for shared reading buffers adverse parenting impacts: an RCT in Brazil

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pre-pandemic support for shared reading buffers adverse parenting impacts: an RCT in Brazil

Luciane R Piccolo et al. Pediatr Res. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: To examine whether (1) a parent-child reading program (Universidade do Bebê [UBB]), conducted in Brazil pre-pandemic can support parenting and parent-child reading 6 months into the pandemic, (2) cognitive stimulation at pandemic onset mediates effects of UBB on these outcomes, and (3) UBB pre-pandemic buffers associations between COVID-19-related distress and parenting/parent-child reading 6 months into the pandemic.

Methods: 400 women, either pregnant or with children 0-24 months, were randomized to UBB (n = 200) or control groups. UBB consisted of monthly parent workshops focusing on parent-child reading and a book-lending library. Assessments pre-pandemic (June-2019) and at pandemic onset (April-2020) included cognitive stimulation. Assessments 6 months into the pandemic (October-2020) included COVID-19 exposure/impact/distress, as well as parenting and parent-child reading.

Results: 133 families (n = 69 UBB) contributed data 6 months into the pandemic. Participation in UBB pre-pandemic was associated with parent-child reading but not parenting 6 months into the pandemic. Indirect effects of UBB through cognitive stimulation at pandemic onset were observed for both outcomes. Increased COVID-19-related distress was significantly associated with reduced parenting/parent-child reading 6 months into the pandemic in the control group only.

Conclusion: Promotion of cognitive stimulation pre-pandemic may have reduced risk for effects of the pandemic on parenting/parent-child reading.

Clinical trial registration: The trial has been registered with the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry RBR-29RZDH on 05/28/2018.

Impact: This is the first study showing sustained impacts of a reading aloud intervention beginning in pregnancy and early infancy implemented pre-pandemic. Findings suggest that participation in a reading-aloud intervention buffered associations between COVID-19 distress and parenting/parent-child reading 6 months into the pandemic. Novel empirical evidence suggests that promotion of cognitive stimulation prior to the pandemic may buffer its impacts on parenting and parent-child book reading following onset in low- and middle-income countries. Findings provide important new support for implementation of parent-child reading aloud programs and likely have implications for early childhood development beyond the COVID-19 pandemic for disasters generally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Study flow diagram.
Participant flow from eligibility assessment through enrollment, intervention, and data collection to completion of follow-up.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Effects of UBB.
Effects of UBB on a parenting and b parent–child reading 6 months into the pandemic, including total, direct, and indirect effects mediated by impacts on cognitive stimulation in the home at pandemic onset. β = standardized coefficients. Models were adjusted for baseline covariates and cognitive stimulation, as well as COVID-19-related Distress.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. UBB Moderated effects of COVID-19-related distress level on parenting and parent–child book reading 6 months into the pandemic.
a, b The negative associations between COVID-19-related stress and parenting 6 months into the pandemic were buffered for the UBB group, but statistically significant for the control group. Models were adjusted for baseline covariates.

References

    1. Kammerbauer M, Wamsler C. Social inequality and marginalization in post-disaster recovery: challenging the consensus? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;24:411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.019. - DOI
    1. do Carmo RF, Silva Júnior JVJ, Pastor AF, de Souza CDF. Spatiotemporal dynamics, risk areas and social determinants of dengue in Northeastern Brazil, 2014–2017: an ecological study. Infect. Dis. Poverty. 2020;9:153. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00772-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diderichsen F, Augusto LG, da S, Perez B. Understanding social inequalities in Zika infection and its consequences: a model of pathways and policy entry-points. Glob. Public Health. 2019;14:675–683. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1532528. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCoy DC, et al. Global estimates of the implications of COVID‐19‐related preprimary school closures for children’s instructional access, development, learning, and economic wellbeing. Child Dev. 2021;92:13658. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13658. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osendarp S, et al. The COVID-19 crisis will exacerbate maternal and child undernutrition and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Food 2021 27. 2021;2:476–484. - PubMed

Publication types