Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Nov 29:16:1095735.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1095735. eCollection 2022.

Editorial: Interpersonal synchrony and network dynamics in social interaction

Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial: Interpersonal synchrony and network dynamics in social interaction

Viktor Müller et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .
No abstract available

Keywords: functional connectivity; group interaction; hyperscanning; interpersonal action coordination; intra- and inter-brain synchronization; network topology and network dynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Joint forward model for interpersonal action coordination and various social interaction situations described in the Research Topic. The joint forward model for interpersonal action coordination with three representation levels (i.e., representation of individual, other's, and joint forward models with corresponding sensorimotor feedbacks) is represented in the middle left (adapted from Müller et al., 2021). This model reflects a variety of the interactions described in the Research Topic. On the bottom left, a hyper-frequency connectivity structure of a choir singing a canon with different voices is displayed (adapted from Müller et al., 2018a). A hyper-brain network with intra- and inter-brain connectivity emerging during an interaction of two people is schematically represented on the top left. The structure represents two hyper-brain modules or communities (coded in blue and red) comprising nodes from two different brains, as described in Müller. On the right, different interaction situations described in the Research Topic are presented (adapted from Klein et al. and Lange et al.; cf. also Müller et al. for the soccer game; the guitarist duo on the top right, Copyright © Arne Sattler).

Comment on

  • Editorial on the Research Topic Interpersonal synchrony and network dynamics in social interaction

References

    1. Bashan A., Bartsch R. P., Kantelhardt J. W., Havlin S., Ivanov P. C. (2012). Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function. Nat. Commun. 3, 702. 10.1038/ncomms1705 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casey-Campbell M., Martens M. L. (2009). Sticking it all together: a critical assessment of the group cohesion-performance literature. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11, 223–246. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x - DOI
    1. Chabin T., Gabriel D., Comte A., Haffen E., Moulin T., Pazart L. (2022). Interbrain emotional connection during music performances is driven by physical proximity and individual traits. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1508, 178–195. 10.1111/nyas.14711 - DOI - PubMed
    1. D'Ausilio A., Novembre G., Fadiga L., Keller P. E. (2015). What can music tell us about social interaction? Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 111–114. 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumas G., Fairhurst M. T. (2021). Reciprocity and alignment: quantifying coupling in dynamic interactions. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, rsos.210138. 10.1098/rsos.210138 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources