Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 29:13:989599.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989599. eCollection 2022.

When combining injunctive and descriptive norms strengthens the hypocrisy effect: A test in the field of discrimination

Affiliations

When combining injunctive and descriptive norms strengthens the hypocrisy effect: A test in the field of discrimination

Maxime Mauduy et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The induced-hypocrisy is a paradigm in which people promote a normative behavior (normative salience step) and then recall their past transgressions (transgression salience step). It is an effective two-step procedure for encouraging prosocial behaviors. This study aims to explore whether discrimination can be reduced using the hypocrisy paradigm combining two kinds of social norms, namely injunctive and descriptive norms. We assigned 80 participants to descriptive norm-related hypocrisy, injunctive norm-related hypocrisy, combined-norm hypocrisy, and control conditions. Results showed that intention to adopt active normative behaviors was higher in the combined-norms than in the single norm hypocrisy conditions. We observed the same pattern in reducing discriminatory behaviors in the Cyberball game, which measures passive discrimination (exclusion). Our findings have both practical and theoretical implications. First, they provide a new and effective means for producing behavioral changes in the field of discrimination. Second, they contribute to further investigating the explanatory processes underlying the hypocrisy effect.

Keywords: Cyberball game; descriptive norm; discrimination prevention; induced-hypocrisy paradigm; injunctive norm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer LR declared a shared research group with the author(s) to the handling Editor.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the cyberball game for female participants. The bogus players’ images were taken from the Langner et al. (2010) radboud faces database. Reproduced with permission from Langner et al. (2010), available at: https://rafd.socsci.ru.nl/RaFD2/RaFD?p=main.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants’ amount of volunteering. Volunteering of participants is shown for the four experimental conditions (N = 80). Volunteering was measured by asking participants how much time they were willing to give to a discrimination prevention association. Volunteering is in minutes and error bars show standard deviations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in participants’ hesitation given inclusion. Differences in participants’ hesitation given inclusion (HGI) between the black player and the white players are shown for the four experimental conditions (N = 80). Differences in hesitation given inclusion were calculated by subtracting the average HGI scores of the white players from the HGI score of the black player. Scores are in milliseconds and error bars show standard deviations.

References

    1. Abdi H., Williams L. J. (2010). Contrast analysis: how to express a research hypothesis as a contrast. Encyclopedia of Research Design, 1–14.
    1. Amodio D. M., Devine P. G., Harmon-jones E. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychol. Sci. 18, 524–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anier N., Badea C., Berthon M., Guimond S. (2018). Perceived acculturation preferences of minority groups and intergroup discrimination: when culture-specific intergroup norms matter. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 48, 506–518. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12530 - DOI
    1. Aronson E. (1999). “Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept,” in Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. eds. Harmon-Jones E., Mills J. (United States: American Psychological Association; ), 103–126.
    1. Aronson E., Fried C., Stone J. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. Am. J. Public Health 81, 1636–1638. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.81.12.1636, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources