Meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of albumin in the prevention and treatment of complications in patients with cirrhosis
- PMID: 36524316
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.17344
Meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of albumin in the prevention and treatment of complications in patients with cirrhosis
Abstract
Introduction: Albumin is used in multiple situations in patients with cirrhosis, but the evidence of its benefit is not always clear. The aim was to synthesise the evidence on the efficacy and safety of albumin compared to other treatments or no active intervention in cirrhotic patients.
Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL up to May 2022. We assessed all-cause mortality, liver transplant, cirrhosis complications of any type and serious adverse events (SAEs). Second, AEs, hospital readmission, length of hospital stay, need for paracentesis and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated. Meta-analyses with Mantel-Haenszel method and random-effects model were performed.
Results: Fifty studies (5118 participants) were included. Albumin was associated with a reduction in mortality in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.75; low certainty) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.83; low certainty) when compared to no administration of albumin, but not in other scenarios. In general, no additional benefit of albumin was found in liver transplants, SAEs or cirrhosis complications (low/very low certainty). Long-term administration (>3 months) of albumin led to a reduction in cirrhosis complications (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.97; low certainty), hospital readmissions, length of hospital stay, need for paracentesis and improvement of QoL.
Conclusion: Albumin may reduce mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with SBP or HE. No benefit was identified in reducing liver transplants or SAEs. Long-term administration may be associated with a lower risk of cirrhosis complications and need for paracentesis.
Keywords: adverse events; albumin; ascites; efficacy; hepatic encephalopathy; hepatology; liver cirrhosis; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; systematic review.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Letter: Albumin-Does formulation matter? Authors' reply.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;57(12):1484-1485. doi: 10.1111/apt.17546. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37243460 No abstract available.
-
Letter: Albumin-Does formulation matter?Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;57(12):1482-1483. doi: 10.1111/apt.17531. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37243466 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Caraceni P, Tufoni M, Bonavita ME. Clinical use of albumin. Blood Transfus. 2013;11(SUPPL. 4):s18-25.
-
- Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, Francoz C, Mookerjee RP, Trebicka J, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):406-60.
-
- Runyon BA. Management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis: an update. Hepatology. 2009;50(4):1321.
-
- Caraceni P, Angeli P, Prati D, Bernardi M, Liumbruno GM, Bennardello F, et al. AISF-SIMTI position paper: the appropriate use of albumin in patients with liver cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(1):4-15.
-
- Zaccherini G, Tufoni M, Bernardi M. Albumin administration is efficacious in the Management of Patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review of the literature. Hepat Med. 2020;12(101544801):153-72.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical