Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- PMID: 36526336
- PMCID: PMC10086274
- DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223443
Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can discontinue glucocorticoids (GC) after GC 'bridging' in the initial treatment step and to identify factors that may affect this.
Methods: Data from 7 clinical trial arms (with 1653 patients) that included a GC bridging schedule, previously identified in a systematic literature search, were combined in an individual patient data meta-analysis. Outcomes were GC use (yes/no) at predefined time points (1/3/6/12/18 months after bridging had ended), cumulative GC dose and continuous (≥3 months) GC use after bridging had ended. Age, sex, ACPA status, initial GC dose, duration of bridging schedule, oral versus parenteral GC administration and initial co-treatment were univariably tested with each outcome.
Results: The probability of using GC 1 month after bridging therapy had ended was 0.18, decreasing to 0.07 from 6 until 18 months after bridging had ended. The probability of continuous GC use after bridging had ended was 0.18 at 1 year and 0.30 at 2 years of follow-up. In oral GC bridging studies only, the probabilities of later and continuous GC use and the cumulative GC doses were higher compared to the combined analyses with also parenteral GC bridging studies included. A higher initial dose and a longer GC bridging schedule were associated with higher cumulative GC doses and more patients on GC at 18 months after bridging had ended.
Conclusions: Based on these RA clinical trial arms with an initial GC bridging schedule, the probability of subsequent ongoing GC use following bridging is low.
Keywords: arthritis, rheumatoid; glucocorticoids; therapeutics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: LvO, MB, PHPdJ, RBML, JSS and TWJH declare no competing interests. PV: holds the Pfizer Chair Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Management at KU Leuven and received consultancy and/or speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma, Roularta and Sidekick Health within the last 24 months. SAB: received an ASPIRE grant from Pfizer. CFA: received study grants for BeSt and IMPROVED from Centocor (now Janssen) and AbbVie, respectively. PE: provided expert advice to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. And clinical trials: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung. WL received study grants from Pfizer, and consultancy speaker fees from Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Galapagos and UCB.
References
-
- Chatzidionysiou K, Emamikia S, Nam J, et al. . Efficacy of glucocorticoids, conventional and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review Informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1102–7. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210711 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous