Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21771.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26204-z.

Radial diffusivity reflects general decline rather than specific cognitive deterioration in multiple sclerosis

Affiliations

Radial diffusivity reflects general decline rather than specific cognitive deterioration in multiple sclerosis

Johan Baijot et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Advanced structural brain imaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), have been used to study the relationship between DTI-parameters and cognitive scores in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study, we assessed cognitive function in 61 individuals with MS and a control group of 35 healthy individuals with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, the California Verbal Learning Test-II, the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, and Stroop-test. We also acquired diffusion-weighted images (b = 1000; 32 directions), which were processed to obtain the following DTI scalars: fractional anisotropy, mean, axial, and radial diffusivity. The relation between DTI scalars and cognitive parameters was assessed through permutations. Although fractional anisotropy and axial diffusivity did not correlate with any of the cognitive tests, mean and radial diffusivity were negatively correlated with all of these tests. However, this effect was not specific to any specific white matter tract or cognitive test and demonstrated a general effect with only low to moderate individual voxel-based correlations of <0.6. Similarly, lesion and white matter volume show a general effect with medium to high voxel-based correlations of 0.5-0.8. In conclusion, radial diffusivity is strongly related to cognitive impairment in MS. However, the strong associations of radial diffusivity with both cognition and whole brain lesion volume suggest that it is a surrogate marker for general decline in MS, rather than a marker for specific cognitive functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tract-based spatial statistics nonparametric permutation inference results of comparing the diffusion tensor parameters of PwMS and HS. For better visualisation purposes the results are projected on top of a standard MNI image, with the assessed IIT-FA-skeleton shown in green and the significant outcomes thickened. Regions in red and blue respectively indicate a significant decrease or increase of the diffusion tensor parameter in PwMS compared to HS. For better visualization, the data can be visualized in 3D in the repository: https://neurovault.org/collections/LYEGOWBT/.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of r-values from the voxel-wise Pearson correlations between the diffusion tensor parameters and neuropsychological z-scores, for the significant voxels of the TFCE analysis. Results using the cut-off of 0.001 are shown in green and the corresponding volume is indicated with **. In blue we also show the results of cut-off 0.05 and its corresponding volume.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Map of the likelihood of lesions (FLAIR hyperintensities) in the MS group (in percentage).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of r-values from the voxel-wise Pearson correlations between the diffusion tensor parameters and volumetric parameters and EDSS, for the significant voxels of the TFCE analysis. Results using the cut-off of 0.001 are shown in green and the corresponding volume is indicated with **. In blue we also show the results of cut-off 0.05 and its corresponding volume.

References

    1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391:1622–1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leavitt VM, Tosto G, Riley CS. Cognitive phenotypes in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2018;265:562–566. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8747-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sumowski JF, et al. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: State of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology. 2018;90:278–288. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell J, Rashid W, Cercignani M, Langdon D. Cognitive impairment among patients with multiple sclerosis: Associations with employment and quality of life. Postgrad. Med. J. 2017;93:143–147. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goretti B, et al. Impact of cognitive impairment on coping strategies in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2010;112:127–130. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.10.019. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms