Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;26(3):471-474.
doi: 10.1007/s10123-022-00311-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.

High performance of the automated ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in nasopharyngeal samples with high viral load

Affiliations

High performance of the automated ADVIA Centaur Systems SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in nasopharyngeal samples with high viral load

Esther Ríos et al. Int Microbiol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

ADVIA Centaur SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (COV2Ag) Assay (Siemens Healthineers) was evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 detection. A total of 141 nasopharyngeal samples were analyzed by this technique and results were compared with those obtained by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the test were 68.70% and 70%, respectively. Regarding cycle threshold (Ct) values, the COV2Ag test showed a sensitivity of 93.75% and 100% for nasopharyngeal samples with Ct < 25 and < 20, respectively. ADVIA Centaur COV2Ag Assay is a useful, automated, and rapid technique for early SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and isolation of the infected individuals, avoiding its transmission.

Keywords: PCR; Rapid antigen test; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity; Specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection according to RT-PCR results. a Distribution of CoVAg index values according to RT-PCR results. b Distribution of CoVAg index values according to Ct values. Data are presented as mean ± SEM

References

    1. Altawalah H, Alfouzan W, Al-Fadalah T, Ezzikouri S. Diagnostic performance of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in nasal swab during COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Diagnostics (basel) 2021;11(11):2110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112110. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirotsu Y, Maejima M, Shibusawa M, Nagakubo Y, Hosaka K, Amemiya K, Sueki H, Hayakawa M, Mochizuki H, Tsutsui T, Kakizaki Y, Miyashita Y, Yagi S, Kojima S, Omata M. Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;99:397–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.029. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hörber S, Drees C, Ganzenmueller T, Schmauder K, Peter S, Biskup D, Peter A. Evaluation of a laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022;60(9):1478–1485. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jeewandara C, Guruge D, Pushpakumara PD, Madhusanka D, Jayadas TT, Chaturanga IP, Aberathna IS, Danasekara S, Pathmanathan T, Jayathilaka D, Somathilaka G, Kuruppu H, Gomes L, Gunasekara V, Wijayamuni R, Ogg GS, Malavige GN. Sensitivity and specificity of two WHO approved SARS-CoV2 antigen assays in detecting patients with SARS-CoV2 infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07240-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kevadiya BD, Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Oleynikov MD, Blomberg WR, Bajwa N, Soni D, Das S, Hasan M, Patel M, et al. Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Mater. 2021;20:593–605. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00906-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed