Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1542.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08941-z.

Multi-method study of the implementation of Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) in real-world settings

Laurie Lindamer  1   2 , Erin Almklov  3 , James O E Pittman  3   4 , Shuyuan Shi  5 , Jacqueline Maye  3   4 , Amy Jak  3   4 , Elizabeth Twamley  3   4 , Borsika Rabin  3   6
Affiliations

Multi-method study of the implementation of Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) in real-world settings

Laurie Lindamer et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) and Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) are evidence-based compensatory cognitive training interventions that improve cognition in persons with a history of traumatic brain injury or other neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite demonstrated efficacy, use and effectiveness of CogSMART/CCT in real-world settings is not known.We used a multi-method design to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative survey data from several domains of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to gather information about use of CogSMART/CCT in real-world settings from provider and patient perspectives. Surveys were sent to email addresses from persons who registered on the CogSMART website seeking access to training manuals and other resources. Descriptive statistics were generated, and we used Natural Language Processing methods to study the self-report free responses. Using n-gram analysis, we identified the most frequently reported responses.We found CogSMART/CCT was broadly used in real-world settings and delivered by a variety of providers for several patient groups with high attendance and overall high satisfaction. CogSMART/CCT seemed to be offered in VA- or university-related clinics more than in private practice or rehabilitation centers. The diversity of providers and variety of formats by which to deliver CogSMART/CCT (i.e., individual, group, telehealth) seemed to play a role in its widespread implementation, as did its adaptability. Most providers made adaptations to the intervention that reduced the length or number of sessions. These changes were most likely to be based on client characteristics. The low rates of formal training, however, may have contributed to lower levels of perceived helpfulness among patients.Reach and Adoption of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention improved by increasing access to the manuals. Attention to characteristics of dissemination and implementation in the design of an intervention may enhance its use in real-world settings. The relevant outcomes, easy access to training manuals, and adaptability of CogSMART/CCT seem to have been important factors in its use in a variety of settings and for several disorders with cognitive impairment. The adoption of CogSMART/CCT by a variety of providers other than neuropsychologists suggests its use may be broadened to other healthcare providers, if adequately trained, to increase access to an intervention with demonstrated efficacy for cognitive rehabilitation for several neuropsychiatric disorders.

Keywords: CogSMART; Dissemination; Implementation; Multi method; Neuropsychiatric disorders; RE-AIM; Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Perceived Helpfulness of CogSMART/CCT Domains by Provider and Patient Groups
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vanderploeg RD, Belanger HG, Curtiss G, Bowles AO, Cooper DB. Reconceptualizing rehabilitation of individuals with chronic symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. Rehab Psychol. 2019;64:1–12. doi: 10.1037/rep0000255. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howe EI, Fure SCR, Løvstad M, Enehaug H, Sagstad K, Hellstrøm T, et al. Effectiveness of combining compensatory cognitive training and vocational intervention vs. treatment as usual on return to work following mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: interim analysis at 3 and 6 Month follow-up. Front Neurol. 2020;11:561400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fure SCR, Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Sveen U, Røe C, et al. Cognitive and vocational rehabilitation after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(5). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33957293/. Cited 2021 Nov 8. - PubMed
    1. Storzbach D, Twamley EW, Roost MS, Golshan S, Williams RM, O Neil M, et al. Compensatory cognitive training for operation enduring freedom/operation iraqi freedom/operation new dawn veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;32(1):16–24. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000228. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Twamley EW, Jak AJ, Delis DC, Bondi MW, Lohr JB. Cognitive symptom management and rehabilitation therapy (CogSMART) for veterans with traumatic brain injury: pilot randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):59–70. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.01.0020. - DOI - PubMed