A decade of non-invasive prenatal screening in Australia: National impact on prenatal screening and diagnostic testing
- PMID: 36529142
- PMCID: PMC10952159
- DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13638
A decade of non-invasive prenatal screening in Australia: National impact on prenatal screening and diagnostic testing
Abstract
Prenatal screening for aneuploidy has undergone immense changes over the past two decades. In 2013 cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) became a new self-funded option primarily for Down syndrome screening, but also other aneuploidies and genetic conditions. The numbers of Medicare item claims for prenatal diagnostic procedures have halved since the introduction of NIPT, while billings for serum screening fell by 40% over the same period, on a background of steady births. Australia is now observing historically low rates of prenatal diagnostic testing. These data provide an informative snapshot of historic changes in prenatal screening and diagnosis, as our sector prepares for the impending impacts of other advances in genomics on maternity care. They also highlight the need to address equity and quality issues that arise when consumers must bear the full costs of improved genomic tests in the absence of Medicare funding.
Keywords: Down syndrome; aneuploidy; obstetrics; pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal screening; serum screening.
© 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Figures
References
-
- Hui L, Muggli E, Halliday JL. Population‐based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38 years of state‐wide data. BJOG 2016; 123(1): 90–97. - PubMed
-
- Hui L, Hyett J. Noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: Challenges for implementation in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 53: 416–424. - PubMed
-
- Lindquist A, Hui L, Poulton A et al. State‐wide utilization and performance of traditional and cell‐free DNA‐based prenatal testing pathways: The Victorian perinatal record linkage (PeRL) study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56(2): 215–224. - PubMed
-
- Robson SJ, Hui L. National decline in invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures in association with uptake of combined first trimester and cell‐free DNA aneuploidy screening. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 55: 507–510. - PubMed
-
- Hui L, Hutchinson B, Poulton A, Halliday J. Population‐based impact of noninvasive prenatal screening on screening and diagnostic testing for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med 2017; 19: 1338–1345. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
