Effect of medical researchers' creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective
- PMID: 36529728
- PMCID: PMC9759886
- DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00876-8
Effect of medical researchers' creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective
Abstract
Background: In recent years, some researchers have engaged in scientific misconduct such as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism to achieve higher research performance. Considering their detrimental effects on individuals' health status (e.g., patients, etc.) and extensive financial costs levied upon healthcare systems, such wrongdoings have even more salience in medical sciences. However, there has been little discussion on the possible influence of medical researchers' existing creative performance on scientific misconduct, and the moral psychological mechanisms underlying those effects are still poorly understood.
Methods: We build a moderated mediation model to test how medical researchers' creative performance affects their scientific misconduct and explore the role of moral licensing and moral identity in this process. Based on situational experiments and projection techniques, 287 medical researchers in China participated in a survey.
Results: Medical researchers' creative performance positively relates to scientific misconduct, and moral licensing plays a mediating role in the relationship between them. In addition, moral identity has a negative moderating effect on the mediating effect of moral licensing on creative performance and scientific misconduct.
Conclusion: Moral licensing plays a fully mediating role in the relationship between creative performance and scientific misconduct. And moral identity negatively moderates the indirect effect of creative performance on scientific misconduct through moral licensing. The findings provide theoretical and practical implications for the prevention of medical researchers' scientific misconduct.
Keywords: Creative performance; Moral identity; Moral licensing; Scientific misconduct.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Zhao S, Zhao J. Study on the factors inducing scientific research misconducts of doctoral students. R&D Manage. 2013;5(03):96–105.
-
- Bai X, Qi Z, Peng D, Yan J, Liu Z. The attribution of research misconduct behaviors:viewpoints from national major S&T projects investigators. Bull Natl Nat Sci Foundation China. 2017;31(03):301–9.
-
- Nill A, Schibrowsky JA. The impact of corporate culture, the reward system, and perceived moral intensity on marketing students’ ethical decision making. J Mark Educ. 2005;27(1):68–80. doi: 10.1177/0273475304273458. - DOI
-
- Zhao J, Miao Y. Scientific misconduct: concepts, theoretical motivation, and determinants. Bull Natl Nat Sci Foundation China. 2016;30(03):243–9.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources