Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 19;23(1):330.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01946-x.

Knowledge, experiences, and attitudes of Australian General Practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: a 2021-2022 survey

Affiliations

Knowledge, experiences, and attitudes of Australian General Practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: a 2021-2022 survey

Zeeta Bawa et al. BMC Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: Medicinal cannabis (MC) products have been available on prescription in Australia for around six years. General practitioners (GPs) are at the forefront of MC prescribing and recent years have seen substantial increases in prescription numbers. This study examined the current knowledge, experiences, and attitudes of Australian GPs around MC. We also compared our findings to those of an earlier 2017 investigation.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a 42-item on-line questionnaire adapted from our earlier 2017 survey. The current survey was completed by GPs attending an on-line, multi-topic educational seminar. Australian GPs (n = 505) completed the survey between November 2021 and February 2022. Data were synthesised using descriptive statistics. MC 'prescribers' and 'non-prescribers' responses were compared using Pearson's χ2 tests.

Results: While most GPs (85.3%) had received patient enquiries about MC during the last three months, only half (52.3%) felt comfortable discussing MC with patients. Around one fifth (21.8%) had prescribed a MC product. GPs strongly supported MC prescribing for palliative care, cancer pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and epilepsy, more so than in our 2017 survey. Prescribing for mental health conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety) and insomnia received less support. Opioids, benzodiazepines, and chemotherapy drugs were rated as more hazardous than MC. GPs correctly endorsed concerns around Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-related driving impairment and drug-seeking behaviour. However, additional concerns endorsed around cannabidiol causing addiction and driving impairment do not agree with current evidence. Consistent with this, many GPs (66.9%) felt they had inadequate knowledge of MC.

Conclusion: Acceptance of MC as a treatment option has increased among Australian GPs since 2017. However, there is a clear need for improved training and education of GPs around cannabis-based medicines to provide increased numbers of skilled prescribers in the community.

Keywords: Cannabinoid; Cannabis; Doctor; General practice; Medicinal cannabis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors ZB and DM declare they have no financial interests. ISM has received honoraria from Janssen, is currently a consultant to Kinoxis Therapeutics, and has received research funding and fellowship support from the Lambert Initiative, NHMRC and Australian Research Council. He holds a variety of patents for non-cannabinoid therapeutics. This survey was conducted at an online seminar run by Healthed and RM is the CEO of Healthed.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The extent to which GPs support the use of medicinal cannabis to treat certain conditions (n = 505). Abbreviation: CINV: chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting; MS: multiple sclerosis; PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Attitudes towards, and perceptions of, MC prescribing and use (n=505). Abbreviations: GP: general practitioner; MC: medicinal cannabis; CBD: cannabidiol; OTC: over the counter. Refer to the Supplementary Materials for a full copy of the survey questions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Perceived knowledge of MC as expressed by GPs (n=505). Abbreviations: AMA: Australian Medical Association; RACGP: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; MC: medicinal cannabis. Refer to the Supplementary Materials for a full copy of the survey questions
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Concerns around the safety and efficacy of THC products (Panel An=505).Concerns around the safety and efficacy of CBD products (Panel B, n=505). Numbers show percentage of GPs (n=505) endorsing agreement, disagreement, and neutrality around specific concerns
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
GPs tended to disagree that MC products were “more hazardous” than commonly prescribed medications (n=505)

References

    1. Federal Register of Legislation. Narcotic Drugs amendment Act, No.12. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government; 2016. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016A00012. [Accessed 16 Aug 2022].
    1. Arnold JC, Nation T, McGregor IS. Prescribing medicinal cannabis. Aust Prescr. 2020;43(5):152–9. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kotsirilos V, McGregor IS. Medicinal cannabis: Where are we? Insights+; 2021. Available from: https://insightplus.mja.com.au/2021/7/medicinal-cannabis-where-are-we/. [Accessed 10 Aug 2022].
    1. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Medicinal cannabis products by active ingredients. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Heath; 2021. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/medicinal-cannabis-products-active-ingredients. [Accessed 28 Mar 2022].
    1. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Medicinal cannabis Special Access Scheme Category B data. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Heath; 2022. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/medicinal-cannabis-special-access-scheme-category.... [Accessed 10 Nov 2022].

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources