Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth: Multilevel analyses of IMAgiNE EURO data from 15 countries in the WHO European region
- PMID: 36530006
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14459
Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth: Multilevel analyses of IMAgiNE EURO data from 15 countries in the WHO European region
Abstract
Objective: To investigate potential associations between individual and country-level factors and medicalization of birth in 15 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Online anonymous survey of women who gave birth in 2020-2021. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models estimating associations between indicators of medicalization (cesarean, instrumental vaginal birth [IVB], episiotomy, fundal pressure) and proxy variables related to care culture and contextual factors at the individual and country level.
Results: Among 27 173 women, 24.4% (n = 6650) had a cesarean and 8.8% (n = 2380) an IVB. Among women with IVB, 41.9% (n = 998) reported receiving fundal pressure. Among women with spontaneous vaginal births, 22.3% (n = 4048) had an episiotomy. Less respectful care, as perceived by the women, was associated with higher levels of medicalization. For example, women who reported having a cesarean, IVB, or episiotomy reported not feeling treated with dignity more frequently than women who did not have those interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1.37; OR 1.61; OR 1.51, respectively; all: P < 0.001). Country-level variables contributed to explaining some of the variance between countries.
Conclusion: We recommend a greater emphasis in health policies on promotion of respectful and patient-centered care approaches to birth to enhance women's experiences of care, and the development of a European-level indicator to monitor medicalization of reproductive care.
Keywords: Europe; IMAgiNE EURO; birth; cesarean; episiotomy; gender equality; medicalization; midwifery; respectful maternity care.
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations: Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. WHO; 2018.
-
- MacFarlane AJ, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2016;123:559-568.
-
- Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: a multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003103.
-
- OECD iLibrary. Health at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. Caesarean sections. Accessed July 1, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/fa1f7281-en/index.html?itemId=/conte...
-
- World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. WHO; 2015. Accessed July 1, 2021. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical