Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 7:30:102045.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102045. eCollection 2022 Dec.

The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study

Affiliations

The impact of multi-target stool DNA testing in clinical practice in the United States: A real-world evidence retrospective study

Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

Widely endorsed screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC) include structural visualization (e.g. colonoscopy) and stool-based tests including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), or high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT). However, CRC screenings are underutilized, hence understanding the screening utilization trends is important, particularly with respect to the newest guideline-endorsed option (mt-sDNA). The objective of this study was to assess patterns in overall CRC screenings following clinical availability of the mt-sDNA test among average-risk individuals in the Ascension Wisconsin healthcare system focusing primarily on individuals aged 50-75 years old. We also reported CRC screening behaviors among individuals < 50 and > 75 years old. Electronic medical records of individuals aged ≥ 40 years from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed to identify average-risk and screen-eligible members. For those with screening data available, we determined the proportion who were up-to-date with any United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening strategy; the number of screening tests performed in the measurement year; and the distribution of screening modalities. Temporal trends were assessed using regression analysis, including subgroup analyses across age groups and screening modalities. A total of 172,045 unique patients aged ≥ 40 years were included, of which 115,708 individuals aged 50-75 years. When considering all individuals up-to-date and screened in the measurement year, overall adherence increased significantly over the 4-year study period, from 39,105 to 49,698 patients or 47 % to 59 % (p < 0.0001). The screening incidence between 2015 and 2018 increased from 19.44 to 23.66 tests per 1,000 persons for gFOBT and FIT, a 1.2-fold increase, and from 6.54 to 29.78 tests per 1,000 persons for mt-sDNA (p < 0.05), a 4.6-fold increase. During the same time period, the screening incidence of colonoscopy decreased from 119.99 to 110.58 tests per 1,000 persons, corresponding to a decrease of 8 %. Similar patterns in screening incidence rates were observed among those aged < 50 and > 75 years old. Growing adoption, higher preference, and the broad availability of mt-sDNA testing may be associated with an increase in overall CRC screening rates in the average-risk population, in parallel with a slight increase in the use of other non-invasive CRC screening tests.

Keywords: Colonoscopy Stool-based tests; Colorectal Cancer; Real-World; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study Flow Schema.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Screening Adherence (Overall and by Age groups).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020-2022. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2020.
    1. American Cancer Society, 2021. Key Statistics for Colorectal Cancer: How common is colorectal cancer? Available at https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/about/key-statistics. Accessed March 16, 2022.
    1. Azulay R., Valinsky L., Hershkowitz F., Elran E., Lederman N., Kariv R., Braunstein B., Heymann A. Barriers to completing colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test. Isr. J. Health Policy Res. 2021;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00444-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. BRFSS Survey Data and Documentation, 2020. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Atlanta : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020.
    1. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Quinn V.P., Doubeni C.A., Zauber A.G., Lee J.K., Schottinger J.E., Marks A.R., Zhao W.K., Ghai N.R., Lee A.T., Contreras R., Quesenberry C.P., Fireman B.H., Levin T.R. Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. JAMA. 2017;317(16):1631–1641. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources