Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;2(10):1119-1128.
doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0166. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

Financial Toxicities Persist for Cancer Survivors Irrespective of Current Cancer Status: An Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Affiliations

Financial Toxicities Persist for Cancer Survivors Irrespective of Current Cancer Status: An Analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey

Mohammad A Karim et al. Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

This study estimates the out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures for different cancer types among survivors with current vs no current cancer condition and across sex, which is understudied in the literature. This is a cross-sectional study of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data for 2009-2018 where the primary outcome was the average per year OOP expenditure incurred by cancer survivors. Of 189 285 respondents, 15 010 (7.93%) were cancer survivors; among them, 46.28% had a current cancer condition. Average per year OOP expenditure for female survivors with a current condition of breast cancer ($1730), lung cancer ($1679), colon cancer ($1595), melanoma ($1783), non-Hodgkin lymphoma ($1656), nonmelanoma/other skin cancer (NMSC, $2118) and two or more cancers ($2310) were significantly higher than that of women with no history of cancer ($853, all P < .05). Similarly, average per year OOP expenditure for male survivors with a current condition of prostate cancer ($1457), lung cancer ($1131), colon cancer ($1471), melanoma ($1474), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma ($1653), NMSC ($1789), and bladder cancer ($2157) were significantly higher compared with the men with no history of cancer ($621, all P < .05). These differences persisted in survivors with no current cancer condition for breast cancer among women; prostate, lung, colon, and bladder cancer among men; and melanoma, NMSC, and two or more cancers among both sexes. OOP expenditure varied across cancer types and by sex for survivors with and without a current cancer condition. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions for cancer survivors.

Keywords: Cancer; Cancer survivors; Costs; Health expenditures; Out-of-pocket expenditure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest statement: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
    1. Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, et al. . The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist 2013;18:381–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrera PM, Kantarjian HM, Blinder VS. The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:153–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chino F, Peppercorn JM, Rushing C, Kamal AH, Altomare I, Samsa G, et al. . Out-of-pocket costs, financial distress, and underinsurance in cancer care. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1582–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karim MA, Singal AG, Ohsfeldt RL, Morrisey MA, Kum H-C. Health services utilization, out-of-pocket expenditure, and underinsurance among insured non-elderly cancer survivors in the United States, 2011–2015. Cancer Med 2021;10:5513–23. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types