Review: COVID-19 highlights the importance of camera traps for wildlife conservation research and management
- PMID: 36531528
- PMCID: PMC9746925
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108984
Review: COVID-19 highlights the importance of camera traps for wildlife conservation research and management
Abstract
COVID-19 has altered many aspects of everyday life. For the scientific community, the pandemic has called upon investigators to continue work in novel ways, curtailing field and lab research. However, this unprecedented situation also offers an opportunity for researchers to optimize and further develop available field methods. Camera traps are one example of a tool used in science to answer questions about wildlife ecology, conservation, and management. Camera traps have long battery lives, lasting more than a year in certain cases, and photo storage capacity, with some models capable of wirelessly transmitting images from the field. This allows researchers to deploy cameras without having to check them for up to a year or more, making them an ideal field research tool during restrictions on in-person research activities such as COVID-19 lockdowns. As technological advances allow cameras to collect increasingly greater numbers of photos and videos, the analysis techniques for large amounts of data are evolving. Here, we describe the most common research questions suitable for camera trap studies and their importance for biodiversity conservation. As COVID-19 continues to affect how people interact with the natural environment, we discuss novel questions for which camera traps can provide insights on. We conclude by summarizing the results of a systematic review of camera trap studies, providing data on target taxa, geographic distribution, publication rate, and publication venues to help researchers planning to use camera traps in response to the current changes in human activity.
Keywords: Biodiversity monitoring; COVID-19; Camera traps; Conservation biology; Data analysis; Remote sensing; Tropical biology; Wildlife ecology.
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Adler F.R., Green A.M., Şekercioğlu Ç.H. Citizen science in ecology: a place for humans in nature. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020;1469:52–64. - PubMed
-
- Ahumada J.A., Silva C.E.F., Gajapersad K., Hallam C., Hurtado J., Martin E., McWilliam A., Mugerwa B., O'Brien T., Rovero F., Sheil D., Spironello W.R., Winarni N., Andelman S.J. Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2011;366:2703–2711. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ahumada J.A., Fegraus E., Birch T., Flores N., Kays R., O'Brien T.G., Palmer J., Schuttler S., Zhao J.Y., Jetz W., Kinnarid M., Kulkarni S., Lyet A., Thau D., Duong M., Oliver R., Dancer A. Wildlife insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environ. Conserv. 2020;47:1–6.
-
- Bakar N.A., Rosbi S. Effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to tourism industry. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 2020;7
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous