Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 14:1-19.
doi: 10.1007/s43615-022-00243-0. Online ahead of print.

Circular Economy in the Food Chain: Production, Processing and Waste Management

Affiliations
Review

Circular Economy in the Food Chain: Production, Processing and Waste Management

Maria Luiza M B B Gonçalves et al. Circ Econ Sustain. .

Abstract

Food processing, from agricultural production to domestic consumption, is responsible for generating great amounts of waste per year, resulting in soil, water, and air pollution. These pollutants, together with the uses of petrochemical process inputs such as solvents, additives, or fuels, increase the food chain's environment impacts resulting in wasted resources. In response to this scenario, the circular economy (CE) theory is presented in literature as a liable alternative for the design of more sustainable production chains. In this context, this work was aimed at evaluating the literature's approach on the CE concept within the food processing and food waste management. The works show the centrality of "food waste" as a focus for the application of the CE. However, despite the relevance of management, reuse, or valuation of food waste, particularly due to its contribution to carbon footprint and decrease of food safety, studies have found other strategies for improvement of CE in the food chain. In this case, works in literature were allocated within the framework presented by the Ellen Macarthur Foundation called ReSOLVE, with proposals for modification of production chain to promote the CE. Among the proposals, one should highlight: modification of productive systems for mitigation of environmental impacts and greenhouse emissions, processes optimization for decreasing the use of natural resources and wastes, use of 4.0 Industry such as IoT, big data, or machine learning techniques for improvement of the whole supply chain, development of collaborative platforms for production and market, use of residues or co-products by design of intra- or inter-chain loops, and exchange of process or inputs with high environmental impacts for greener ones.

Keywords: Bioeconomy; Food products; Green alternatives; Sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart regarding how bibliometric research was conducted in this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Distribution of documents per year and b distribution of documents published per country (research origin)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Tree map with the fields of knowledge of the journals
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Inverted Pyramid showing a hierarchy of actions for food waste management, adapted from [39]. Green actions for food surplus, orange and yellow actions for wastes, and red for losses

References

    1. Food and Agriculture Organization (2019) FAOSTAT Database 2019
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization (2020) FAOSTAT Database 2020
    1. United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Accessed 10 Dec 2022
    1. Blomsma F, Brennan G. The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity. J Ind Ecol. 2017;2:603–614. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12603. - DOI
    1. Jurgilevich A, et al. Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability. 2016;8:1–14. doi: 10.3390/su8010069. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources