Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;13(1):61-68.
doi: 10.1177/19418744221123194. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

End-Of-Life Care in the Potential Donor after Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review

Stefanie P Cappucci  1   2 , Wade S Smith  3 , Richard Schwartzstein  4 , Douglas B White  5 , Susan L Mitchell  2   6 , Corey R Fehnel  1   2   6
Affiliations
Review

End-Of-Life Care in the Potential Donor after Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review

Stefanie P Cappucci et al. Neurohospitalist. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is becoming increasingly common, yet little is known about the way potential donors receive end-of-life care.

Purpose: The aims of this systematic review are to describe the current practice in end-of-life care for potential donors and identify metrics that are being used to assess discomfort among these patients.

Research design and study sample: This review encompasses published literature between June 1, 2000 and June 31, 2020 of end-of-life care received by potential DCD patients. The population of interest was defined as patients eligible for Maastracht classification III donation after circulatory death for a solid organ transplantation. Outcomes examined included: analgesic or palliative protocols, and surrogates of discomfort (eg dyspnea, agitation).

Results: Among 141 unique articles, 27 studies were included for full review. The primary reason for exclusion was lack of protocol description, or lack of reporting on analgesic medications. No primary research studies specifically examined distress in the DCD eligible population. Numerous professional guidelines were identified. Surveys of critical care practitioners identified concerns regarding the impact of symptom management on hastening the dying process in the DCD population as a potential barrier to end-of-life palliative treatment.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of empirical evidence for end-of-life symptom assessment and management for DCD patients. Key evidence gaps identified for DCD include the need for: i) a multidisciplinary structure of treatment teams and preferred environment for DCD, ii) objective tools for monitoring of distress in this patient population, and iii) evidence guiding the administration of analgesic medications following withdrawal of life sustaining therapy.

Keywords: donation after circulatory death; neurocritical care; organ donation; palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SPC has nothing to disclose, WSS reports Ownership interest in MindRhythm, Inc, RS has nothing to disclose, DBW reports grants as below during the conduct of the study; personal fees from American Thoracic Society, personal fees from UpToDate, outside the submitted work; SLM has nothing to disclose, CRF has nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Search strategy and study screening protocol.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neyrinck A, Van Raemdonck D, Monbaliu D. Donation after circulatory death: current status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;1:382-390. - PubMed
    1. Smith M, Dominguez-Gil B, Greer DM, Manara AR, Souter MJ. Organ donation after circulatory death: current status and future potential. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:310-321. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) . Committee on Non-Heart-Beating Transplantation II: The Scientific and Ethical Basis for Practice and Protocols. Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Practice and Protocols. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225025/ - PubMed
    1. Russell JA, Epstein LG, Greer DM, Kirschen M, Rubin MA, Lewis A. Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests: AAN position statement. Neurology. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. 2019;92:228-232. - PubMed
    1. A Position Paper by the Ethics Committee, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine . Recommendations for nonheartbeating organ donation: Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1826–1831. - PubMed