Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1:13:1057850.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1057850. eCollection 2022.

Modulating the tumor immune microenvironment with nanoparticles: A sword for improving the efficiency of ovarian cancer immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Modulating the tumor immune microenvironment with nanoparticles: A sword for improving the efficiency of ovarian cancer immunotherapy

Tianyue Xu et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

With encouraging antitumor effects, immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint blockade has developed into a mainstream cancer therapeutic modality. However, only a minority of ovarian cancer (OC) patients could benefit from immunotherapy. The main reason is that most OC harbor a suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Emerging studies suggest that M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), T regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are enriched in OC. Thus, reversing the suppressive TIME is considered an ideal candidate for improving the efficiency of immunotherapy. Nanoparticles encapsulating immunoregulatory agents can regulate immunocytes and improve the TIME to boost the antitumor immune response. In addition, some nanoparticle-mediated photodynamic and photothermal therapy can directly kill tumor cells and induce tumor immunogenic cell death to activate antigen-presenting cells and promote T cell infiltration. These advantages make nanoparticles promising candidates for modulating the TIME and improving OC immunotherapy. In this review, we analyzed the composition and function of the TIME in OC and summarized the current clinical progress of OC immunotherapy. Then, we expounded on the promising advances in nanomaterial-mediated immunotherapy for modulating the TIME in OC. Finally, we discussed the obstacles and challenges in the clinical translation of this novel combination treatment regimen. We believe this resourceful strategy will open the door to effective immunotherapy of OC and benefit numerous patients.

Keywords: drug delivery system; immunotherapy; nanoparticles; ovarian cancer; tumor immune microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immune cell functions and their interactions in the ovarian cancer tumor microenvironment. M2 TAMs, Tregs, MDSCs, and CAFs suppress the immune response and promote the proliferation, growth, and metastasis of OC. CD8+ T cells, NK cells, mature DCs, and M1 TAMs enhanced the immune response and suppressed tumor growth.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of nanoparticle-mediated immunotherapy regulating the TIME. Nanoparticles are mainly classified as liposomes, micelles, SNPs, and metallic nanoparticles. These nanoparticles have the functions of delivering drugs, delivering nucleic acids, and mediating combination therapy. Based on these functions, nanoparticles can regulate TIME in four ways: (1) mediating PTT and PDT to induce ICD in tumor cells; (2) improving drug targeting to immunosuppressive molecules; (3) targeting Tregs; and (4) targeting TAMs. By reversing the immunosuppressive state of TIME, nanoparticles can enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy such as ICB, ACT, tumor vaccines, and cytokines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Le Saux O, Ray-Coquard I, Labidi-Galy SI. eds. Challenges for immunotherapy for the treatment of platinum resistant ovarian cancer. In: Seminars in cancer biology. (2021) 77:127–43. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.08.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nero C, Ciccarone F, Pietragalla A, Duranti S, Daniele G, Salutari V, et al. . Ovarian cancer treatments strategy: focus on PARP inhibitors and immune check point inhibitors. Cancers. (2021) 13(6):1298. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061298 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coward JI, Middleton K, Murphy F. New perspectives on targeted therapy in ovarian cancer. Int J Womens Health (2015) 7:189–203. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S52379 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baldwin LA, Huang B, Miller RW, Tucker T, Goodrich ST, Podzielinski I, et al. . Ten-year relative survival for epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 120(3):612–8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318264f794 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coukos G, Tanyi J, Kandalaft L. Opportunities in immunotherapy of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol (2016) 27:i11–i5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw084 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types