Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jan 10;147(2):122-131.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061288. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

Prospective Association of Daily Steps With Cardiovascular Disease: A Harmonized Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prospective Association of Daily Steps With Cardiovascular Disease: A Harmonized Meta-Analysis

Amanda E Paluch et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Taking fewer than the widely promoted "10 000 steps per day" has recently been associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality. The relationship of steps and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains poorly described. A meta-analysis examining the dose-response relationship between steps per day and CVD can help inform clinical and public health guidelines.

Methods: Eight prospective studies (20 152 adults [ie, ≥18 years of age]) were included with device-measured steps and participants followed for CVD events. Studies quantified steps per day and CVD events were defined as fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were completed using study-specific quartiles and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI were meta-analyzed with inverse-variance-weighted random effects models.

Results: The mean age of participants was 63.2±12.4 years and 52% were women. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (123 209 person-years), with a total of 1523 CVD events (12.4 per 1000 participant-years) reported. There was a significant difference in the association of steps per day and CVD between older (ie, ≥60 years of age) and younger adults (ie, <60 years of age). For older adults, the HR for quartile 2 was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93), 0.62 for quartile 3 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.74), and 0.51 for quartile 4 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.63) compared with the lowest quartile. For younger adults, the HR for quartile 2 was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.35), 0.90 for quartile 3 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.25), and 0.95 for quartile 4 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.48) compared with the lowest quartile. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated a nonlinear association whereby more steps were associated with decreased risk of CVD among older adults.

Conclusions: For older adults, taking more daily steps was associated with a progressively decreased risk of CVD. Monitoring and promoting steps per day is a simple metric for clinician-patient communication and population health to reduce the risk of CVD.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; exercise; public health; risk reduction behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Association of Steps per Day and CVD Events Stratified by Age and Sex.
Hazard Ratio and 95% Confidence Intervals [HR (95%CI)]. Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex (if applicable). Model 2: Model 1 + device wear time, race/ethnicity (if applicable), education or income, body mass index, and plus study-specific variables for lifestyle (smoking, alcohol), hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, chronic conditions, and general health status. I2 values were considered low (<25%), moderate (25%-75%), or high (>75%). The x-axis is a log scale. *p<0.05 for subgroup difference
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Association of Steps per Day with CVD events for (a) older adults ≥ 60 years and (b) younger adults < 60 year.
Restricted cubic splines of hazard ratios of steps/d with CVD events. Knots set at 10th, 50th, and 90th, percentile of steps/d. Reference set at median of lowest quartile (2,000 for older adults, 3,000 for younger adults).Hazard Ratios are indicated by solid lines and 95% Confidence Intervals are indicated by dotted lines. Model 1 adjusted for age and sex (if applicable). Model 2: Model 1 + device wear time, race/ethnicity (if applicable), education or income, body mass index, lifestyle (smoking, alcohol), hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and self-rated health. The y-axis is a log scale.

References

    1. Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW 3rd, Haskell W and Lee IM. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;124:789–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Ferguson JF, Gupta DK, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Lee CD, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Ma J, Mackey J, Martin SS, Matchar DB, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Roth GA, Samad Z, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Shay CM, Stokes A, VanWagner LB, Wang NY and Tsao CW. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. - PubMed
    1. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee scientific report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.
    1. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM and Olson RD. The physical activity guidelines for americans. JAMA. 2018;320:2020–2028. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, Buroker AB, Goldberger ZD, Hahn EJ, Himmelfarb CD, Khera A, Lloyd-Jones D, McEvoy JW, Michos ED, Miedema MD, Muñoz D, Smith SC Jr., Virani SS, Williams KA, Yeboah J and Ziaeian B. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e563–e595. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding