Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 20;31(1):64.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07524-2.

What are the outcomes of hospice care for cancer patients? A systematic review

Simin Sharafi  1 , Atefeh Ziaee  2 , Hanie Dahmardeh  3
Affiliations

What are the outcomes of hospice care for cancer patients? A systematic review

Simin Sharafi et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: Over the past 2 decades, cancer has been the leading cause of death worldwide. Accordingly, cancer patients are the largest group of patients admitted to a hospice, accounting for 40% of overall hospice admissions every year. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the outcomes of caring for cancer patients at hospices.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for English language articles published during the period from January 2008 to January 2022. The keywords used to search in this systematic review were included hospice, cancer, and neoplasm (for PubMed search only), which were searched in the titles and abstracts of the articles.

Results: Out of 803 articles found in the initial search, 38 were selected based on inclusion criteria. The studies indicated that hospice care resulted in outcomes such as reduced referral and admission to the emergency department (only one study reporting opposite results), reduced length and number of hospital admissions, reduced use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, increased pain reports, improved pain management, enhanced end-of-life quality, significantly reduced cost of treatment, reduced number of invasive interventions, death at home, increased survival and satisfaction of patients, and poor nutritional support.

Conclusion: Given the numerous and significant benefits of care in a hospice for cancer patients, health managers are recommended to consider developing hospices and introducing patients to these centers. Besides, they need to compensate for some shortcomings by, for example, providing better nutritional support and developing a care plan based on the type of cancers that the patients are suffering in hospices so that more specialized services can be delivered.

Keywords: Cancer; Hospice; Neoplasm; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI
    1. Loke SS, Rau KM, Huang CF (2011) Impact of combined hospice care on terminal cancer patients. J Palliat Med 14(6):683–687. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0331 - DOI
    1. Loke SS, Rau KM (2011) Differences between inpatient hospice care and in-hospital nonhospice care for cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 34(3):E21–E26. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181ff78b6 - DOI
    1. Paris J, Morrison RS (2014) Evaluating the effects of inpatient palliative care consultations on subsequent hospice use and place of death in patients with advanced GI cancers. Journal of Oncology Practice 10(3):174–177. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.001429 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources