Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May;24(5):312-333.
doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00564-w. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

Pore-forming proteins as drivers of membrane permeabilization in cell death pathways

Affiliations
Review

Pore-forming proteins as drivers of membrane permeabilization in cell death pathways

Peter Vandenabeele et al. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023 May.

Abstract

Regulated cell death (RCD) relies on activation and recruitment of pore-forming proteins (PFPs) that function as executioners of specific cell death pathways: apoptosis regulator BAX (BAX), BCL-2 homologous antagonist/killer (BAK) and BCL-2-related ovarian killer protein (BOK) for apoptosis, gasdermins (GSDMs) for pyroptosis and mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) for necroptosis. Inactive precursors of PFPs are converted into pore-forming entities through activation, membrane recruitment, membrane insertion and oligomerization. These mechanisms involve protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions, proteolytic processing and phosphorylation. In this Review, we discuss the structural rearrangements incurred by RCD-related PFPs and describe the mechanisms that manifest conversion from autoinhibited to membrane-embedded molecular states. We further discuss the formation and maturation of membrane pores formed by BAX/BAK/BOK, GSDMs and MLKL, leading to diverse pore architectures. Lastly, we highlight commonalities and differences of PFP mechanisms involving BAX/BAK/BOK, GSDMs and MLKL and conclude with a discussion on how, in a population of challenged cells, the coexistence of cell death modalities may have profound physiological and pathophysiological implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ameisen, J. C. Looking for death at the core of life in the light of evolution. Cell Death Differ. 11, 4–10 (2004). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Vriz, S., Reiter, S. & Galliot, B. Cell death: a program to regenerate. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 108, 121–151 (2014). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Fuchs, Y. & Steller, H. Live to die another way: modes of programmed cell death and the signals emanating from dying cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 329–344 (2015). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Harayama, T. & Riezman, H. Understanding the diversity of membrane lipid composition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 281–296 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Liu, X. & Lieberman, J. Knocking ‘em dead: pore-forming proteins in immune defense. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 38, 455–485 (2020). - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources