Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):556.
doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02925-x.

The point-of-care D-dimer test provides a fast and accurate differential diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic syndrome and ST-elevated myocardial infarction in emergencies

Affiliations

The point-of-care D-dimer test provides a fast and accurate differential diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic syndrome and ST-elevated myocardial infarction in emergencies

Xiaoxin Chang et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The research of the sensitivity and specificity point-of-care testing (POCT) of D-dimer as a diagnostic protocol for differential diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic syndrome (hereafter as TAAS) mimicking ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) with regular STEMI in the emergency department is limited.

Methods: Full medical information of 32 patients confirmed TAAS and 527 patients confirmed STEMI from January 1st, 2016 to October 1st, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University.

Results: The baseline characteristics of two groups of patients were well-balanced post propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, and each group had 32 patients enrolled. Patients in the STEMI group had higher positive cardiac troponin I (cTNI) (0.174 ng/ml vs. 0.055 ng/ml, P = 0.008) results but lower D-dimer (0.365μg/ml vs. 31.50μg/ml, P < 0.001) results than the TAAS group. The D-dimer cutoff value of 2.155μg/ml had the best sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.9%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) as well as the negative predictive value (NPV) of the cutoff value were 96.9 and 100%, respectively, in total 64 patients, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.998 (95% CI:0.992-1.000, P < 0.001) for the D-dimer. No significant correlation between the D-dimer concentration and the time from symptoms onset to first medical contact in both groups (TAAS group: r = - 0.248, P = 0.170; STEMI group: r = - 0.159, P = 0.383) or significant correlation between D-dimer and creatine clearance (TAAS group: r = - 0.065, P = 0.765; STEMI group: r = 0.222, P = 0.221). The total in-hospital mortality for the patients with TAAS presenting as STEMI was 62.5% (20/32). The mortality rate for TAAS patients confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) was significantly lower (40% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.014) than the mortality rate for TAAS patients confirmed by coronary angiography (CAG) and had a longer average survival time (log-rank = 0.015), less peri-surgical complications especially gastrointestinal hemorrhage (0.00% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.001). CTA diagnosis can reduce the mortality rate by 67.5% (95%CI:0.124-0.850, P = 0.16).

Conclusions: The POCT D-dimer with cut-off 2.155μg/ml would be useful to rule-out TAAS mimicking STEMI from regular STEMI prior to reperfusion therapy. CTA diagnosis is effective in reducing the probability of perioperative complications and lowering perioperative mortality than CAG diagnosis in TAAS patients.

Keywords: Coronary reperfusion therapy; D-dimer; ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction; Stanford type A aortic syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver-operating characteristic curves indicates the cutoff value for D-dimer is set at 2.155μg/ml had the best sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.9%
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between D-dimer concentration and TIME (time from the onset of symptoms to first medical contact) in the TAAS group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between D-dimer concentration and TIME (time from the onset of symptoms to first medical contact) in the STEMI group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The diagnostic process and outcomes of the TAAS patients
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Long-term survival estimates with the use of Kaplan–Meier method after operation for acute type A aortic dissection by diagnostic method. Significant overall difference is observed (P < 0.005 by log-rank test)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhan S, Hong s, Shan-Shan L, Chen-Ling Y, Lai W, et al. Misdiagnosis of Aortic Dissection:Experience of 361 Patients. J Clin Hypertension. 2012;12:256–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00590.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Di Eusanio M, Sechtem U, et al. Insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation. 2018;137:1846–1860. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031264. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fan QK, Wang WW, Zhang ZL, Liu ZJ, Yang J, Zhao GS, et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected aortic dissection. Clin Chemistry Laboratory Med. 2010;48:1733–7. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JL. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127. - PubMed
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) European Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. - DOI - PubMed

Substances