JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice
- PMID: 36545902
- DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000361
JBI's approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice
Abstract
In this paper, we provide an overview of JBI's approach to evidence implementation and describe the supporting process model that aligns with this approach. The central tenets of JBI's approach to implementing evidence into practice include the use of evidence-based audit and feedback, identification of the context in which evidence is being implemented, facilitation of any change, and an evaluation process. A pragmatic and practical seven-phased approach is outlined to assist with the 'planning' and 'doing' of getting evidence into practice, focusing on clinicians as change agents for implementing evidence in clinical and policy settings. Further research and development is required to formally evaluate the robustness of the approach to better understand the complex nature of evidence implementation.
Copyright © 2022 JBI. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
References
-
- Eccles M, Mittman B. Welcome to Implementation Science . Implement Sci 2006; 1:1.
-
- Bauer M, Kirchner J. Implementation science: what is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res 2020; 283:112376.
-
- Lang E, Wyer P, Haynes R. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med 2007; 49:355–363.
-
- Pearson A, Jordan Z, Munn Z. Translational science and evidence-based healthcare: a clarification and reconceptualization of how knowledge is generated and used in healthcare. Nurs Res Pract 2012; 2012:792519.
-
- Geerligs L, Rankin NM, Shepherd HL, Butow P. Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes. Implement Sci 2018; 13:36.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
