Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 3;12(12):494.
doi: 10.3390/bs12120494.

Extra-Linguistic Cognitive Functions Involved in the Token Test: Results from a Cohort of Non-Aphasic Stroke Patients with Right Hemisphere Lesion

Affiliations

Extra-Linguistic Cognitive Functions Involved in the Token Test: Results from a Cohort of Non-Aphasic Stroke Patients with Right Hemisphere Lesion

Benedetta Basagni et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The Token Test (TT) is widely used to examine comprehension disorders in aphasic patients, but abilities other than language may affect a patient's performance. This study aims to explore the correlation between the TT subtest performances and the performances in extra-linguistic cognitive areas in a cohort of patients from the Intensive Rehabilitation Post-Stroke (RIPS) study with a first, right hemisphere stroke and without aphasia, prospectively enrolled at admission to intensive inpatient post-acute rehabilitation.

Methods: The patients were administered the TT (50-item version), the forward and backward digit span (DST), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Spearman's partial correlations adjusted by age were used to evaluate the association between the number of errors in the TT and the other tests' corrected scores.

Results: Of the 37 patients enrolled in this study, 29.7% made 3-11 errors on the TT, 27.0% more than 11 errors, mostly in parts IV and V. The forward and backward digit span scores showed correlations with errors in part V of the TT (r = -0.408, p = 0.013; r = -0.307, p = 0.027). The errors in part IV of the TT presented a correlation with a forward digit span too (r = -0.394, p = 0.017). With respect to MoCA domains, executive functioning, and orientation were related to the TT part V errors (r = -0.468, p = 0.007; r = -0.499, p = 0.003). The orientation also correlated with the TT part III (r = -0.504, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Our findings show that the TT performances in patients with right hemisphere stroke and without aphasia are related to impairments in auditory-verbal span/auditory working memory mostly for TT scores on subpart V as measured by the DST and to executive function and orientation, as measured by the MoCA subtests.

Keywords: Token Test; comprehension; memory; right hemisphere stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of Token Test (TT) total errors according to the corrected score obtained in the Forward (FDS) and Backward (BDS) Digit Span test. The solid black line represents the line of best fit.

References

    1. De Renzi A., Vignolo L.A. Token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain J. Neurol. 1962;85:665–678. doi: 10.1093/brain/85.4.665. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renzi E., Faglioni P. L’esame dei disturbi afasici di comprensione orale mediante una versione abbreviata del test dei gettoni. Riv. Patol. Nerv. Ment. 1975;96:252–269. - PubMed
    1. De Renzi E., Faglioni P. Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex. 1978;14:41–49. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80006-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bastiaanse R., Raaijmakers S., Satoer D., Visch-Brink E. The Multilingual Token Test. Aphasiology. 2016;30:508. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1121710. - DOI
    1. McNeil M.R., Pratt S.R., Szuminsky N., Sung J.E., Fossett T.R., Fassbinder W., Lim K.Y. Reliability and validity of the computerized Revised Token Test: Comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2015;58:311–324. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-13-0030. - DOI - PubMed