Assessment of Nutritional Risk at ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients with Suspected COVID-19
- PMID: 36547108
- PMCID: PMC9777011
- DOI: 10.3390/clinpract12060100
Assessment of Nutritional Risk at ICU Admission and Mortality in Patients with Suspected COVID-19
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The association between the nutritional risk and mortality in Brazilians with COVID-19 is poorly documented. Therefore, this study, for the first time, aimed at investigating the length of stay in the ICU and the chance of dying in patients with suspected COVID-19, without and with nutritional risk. Subjects/Methods: This retrospective monocentric study enrolled adult, COVID-19-positive patients that were admitted to the ICU at a university hospital. Biochemical analysis and clinical data were collected from medical records and the nutritional risk was assessed according to the Modified-Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score. The Cox model was used to assess the chance of mortality in the patients with and without nutritional risk. Results: Out of 71 patients, 63.3% were male and 52% were older (≥60 years). Although no differences were found between groups for the length of stay in ICU, C-reactive protein, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations, the mNUTRIC ≥ 5 group had higher D-dimer than the mNUTRIC < 5 group. Regarding ICU mortality, most patients (69.5%) in the mNUTRI ≥ 5 group died while in the mNUTRIC < 5 group 33.3% died (p = 0.0001). In addition, patients with mNUTRIC ≥ 5 had (HR: 2.04 [95% CI: 1.02−4.09], p = 0.04) a more likely chance of dying than patients in the mNUTRIC < 5 group, even that adjusted by BMI and D-dimer concentrations (HR: 2.18 [95% CI: 1.04−4.56], p = 0.03). Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, an mNUTRIC ≥ 5 score at admission leads to a more likely chance of death even after controlling for confounding variables.
Keywords: COVID-19; ICU; malnutrition; mortality; nutritional status.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Rahman A., Hasan R.M., Agarwala R., Martin C., Day A.G., Heyland D.K. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clin. Nutr. 2016;35:158–162. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barazzoni R., Bischoff S.C., Breda J., Wickramasinghe K., Krznaric Z., Nitzan D., Pirlich M., Singer P., ESPEN Council ESPEN expert statements and practical guidance for nutritional management of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Nutr. 2020;39:1631–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
