Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 31;38(9):2009-2018.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac337.

Malignancy risk in kidney transplant recipients exposed to immunosuppression pre-transplant for the treatment of glomerulonephritis

Affiliations

Malignancy risk in kidney transplant recipients exposed to immunosuppression pre-transplant for the treatment of glomerulonephritis

David Massicotte-Azarniouch et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. .

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) as their native disease may receive significant amounts of pre-transplant immunosuppression (PTI), which could increase the risk for development of malignancy post-transplant.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of kidney transplant recipients from January 2005 until May 2020. Patients with GN as their native kidney disease who received PTI for treatment of GN (n = 184) were compared with a control cohort (n = 579) of non-diabetic, non-PTI-receiving kidney transplant patients. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for outcomes of first occurrence of solid or hematologic malignancy, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Results: Over a median follow-up of 5.7 years, PTI for GN was associated with significantly increased risk for malignancy compared with controls [13.0% vs 9.7%, respectively; adjusted HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.10-3.00)], but not for NMSC [10.3% vs 11.4%, respectively; adjusted HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.64-1.83)] or PTLD [3.3% vs 3.1%, respectively; adjusted HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.40-2.61)]. The risk for malignancy was significantly increased in those who received cyclophosphamide [HR 2.59 (95% CI 1.48-4.55)] or rituximab [HR 3.82 (95% CI 1.69-8.65)] pre-transplant, and particularly in those who received both cyclophosphamide and rituximab, but not for calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate.

Conclusion: The use of PTI for treatment of GN, especially cyclophosphamide or even with rituximab, is associated with increased risk for development of solid or hematologic malignancy post-transplant. These data highlight potential risks with treatment of GN and underscore the importance of post-transplant malignancy surveillance in this patient population.

Keywords: glomerulonephritis; immunosuppression; kidney transplant; malignancy; non-melanomatous skin cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

V.K.D. reports consultancy agreements with Forma Therapeutics and Novartis; honoraria from UpToDate; and serving in an advisory role for Travere, Merck and Bayer. R.J.F. reports serving on an advisory board for Vertex Pharmaceuticals. M.K.S. reports honoraria from Calliditas, Elsevier, Chemocentryx and Travere therapeutics.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Study flow chart for cohort creation. CAKUT: congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts; HTN: hypertension; PKD: polycystic kidney disease; UNC-H: University of North Carolina Hospital.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Crude cumulative incidence for malignancies observed after kidney transplantation. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves of time to NMSC, with cumulative incidences. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of time to solid or hematologic malignancy observed after kidney transplantation, with cumulative incidences. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves of time to PTLD, with cumulative incidences.

References

    1. Ferguson TW, Tangri N, Rigatto Cet al. . Cost-effective treatment modalities for reducing morbidity associated with chronic kidney disease. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2015;15:243–52. 10.1586/14737167.2015.1012069 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Czyżewski Ł, Sańko-Resmer J, Wyzgał Jet al. . Assessment of health-related quality of life of patients after kidney transplantation in comparison with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Ann Transplant 2014;19:576–85. 10.12659/AOT.891265 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford ELet al. . Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1725–30. 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkelmayer WC, Weinstein MC, Mittleman MAet al. . Health economic evaluations: the special case of end-stage renal disease treatment. Med Decis Making 2002;22:417–30. 10.1177/027298902236927 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vajdic CM, McDonald SP, McCredie MREet al. . Cancer incidence before and after kidney transplantation. JAMA 2006;296:2823–31. 10.1001/JAMA.296.23.2823 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms