Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):631.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02675-4.

Transverse differences between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft palate with skeletal Class III malocclusion using buccolingual inclination: a cone-beam computed tomography retrospective study

Affiliations

Transverse differences between cleft lip and palate and non-cleft palate with skeletal Class III malocclusion using buccolingual inclination: a cone-beam computed tomography retrospective study

Jiabei He et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences between buccolingual inclination (BI) of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and non-cleft palate with skeletal Class III malocclusion. We propose a method of maxillary expansion which is more suitable for patients with CLP.

Methods: For this retrospective study, 40 patients with CLP and 21 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were selected. The CLP group was divided into the unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) groups. The BI of the maxillary first premolar (BI4), maxillary second premolar (BI5) and first molar (BI6) were measured using cone-beam computed tomography, and the differences between them were compared and analyzed by Student's t-test.

Results: There were significant differences between cleft side BI4 and non-cleft side BI4 in the UCLP group, BI5 in the BCLP group, BI4 and BI5 in all CLP groups and the skeletal Class III malocclusion group. BI6 was similar across all three groups.

Conclusions: The premolars of patients with CLP do not exhibit the same regularity as those with Class III malocclusion; this may be related to surgical scarring of the cleft palate. Greater attention should be paid to the correction of BI in the maxillary expansion of patients with CLP.

Keywords: Buccolingual inclination; Cleft lip and palate; Cone-beam computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Definition of landmarks and reference planes using Dolphin software. The coincident sagittal and Frankfurt planes were used as the reference planes for head position
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Method for measuring BI value of premolars
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Method for measuring BI value of molars

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shi B, Losee JE. The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth. Int J Oral Sci. 2015;7(1):14–17. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuseler A, Molsted K, Marcusson A, Heliovaara A, Karsten A, Bellardie H, et al. Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: maxillary growth at eight years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(1):24–29. - PubMed
    1. Lin Y, Chen G, Fu Z, Ma L, Li W. Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of lower facial asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate and non-cleft patients with class iii skeletal relationship. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0130235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luyten J, De Roo NMC, Christiaens J, Van Overberghe L, Temmerman L, De Pauw GAM. Rapid maxillary expansion vs slow maxillary expansion in patients with cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angle Orthod. 2022. 10.2319/030122-188.1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Maurya RK, Sharma P, Kapoor P, Mittal T, Atri M. Effects of maxillary expansion on hearing and voice function in non-cleft lip palate and cleft lip palate patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;87(3):315–325. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.09.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms