Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 1;36(1):45-49.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001206. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

Is venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation an option for managing septic shock

Affiliations
Review

Is venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation an option for managing septic shock

Mohammad A Helwani et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: To describe sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Discuss indications and current evidence of using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in setting of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.

Recent findings: Recent data suggests a survival benefit with the use of VA-ECMO in patients with septic shock complicated by septic-induced cardiomyopathy with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. VA-ECMO was associated with poor outcomes in adults with septic shock without severe systolic dysfunction. The evidence is generated from retrospective and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Summary: Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is an increasingly recognized entity characterized by reversible ventricular dysfunction in the setting of sepsis. When hypotension persists despite standard management of septic shock (e.g. adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, inotropes) and there is evidence of severe cardiac systolic dysfunction and end-organ hypoperfusion, VA-ECMO should be considered as a bridge therapy to recovery. VA-ECMO should not be used for isolated vasodilatory septic shock without significant myocardial dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Font MD, Thyagarajan B, Khanna AK. Sepsis and septic shock – basics of diagnosis, pathophysiology and clinical decision making. Med Clin North Am 2020; 104:573–585.
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315:801–810.
    1. Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet 2018; 392:75–87.
    1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1726–1734.
    1. Kadri SS, Rhee C, Strich JR, et al. Estimating ten-year trends in septic shock incidence and mortality in United States academic medical centers using clinical data. Chest 2017; 151:278–285.