Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease
- PMID: 36550617
- DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003140
Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease
Conflict of interest statement
Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: none reported.
Comment in
-
Reply.Cornea. 2023 Mar 1;42(3):e5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003147. Epub 2022 Dec 22. Cornea. 2023. PMID: 36728963 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Assessing the Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Dry Eye Disease.Cornea. 2022 Aug 1;41(8):1023-1028. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003034. Epub 2022 Mar 24. Cornea. 2022. PMID: 35344972 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Oydanich M, Kuklinski E, Asbell PA. Assessing the quality, reliability, and readability of online information on dry eye disease. Cornea. 2022;41:1023–1028.
-
- American Academy of Ophthalmology. Dry eye syndrome preferred practice pattern—2013. Available at: https://www.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/dry-eye-syndrome-ppp–2013 . Accessed July 21, 2021.
-
- Azer SA, AlSwaidan NM, Alshwairikh LA, et al. Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students? BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008187.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources