Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):1134.
doi: 10.3390/bios12121134.

A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality and Robot Therapy as Recent Rehabilitation Technologies Using EEG-Brain-Computer Interface Based on Movement-Related Cortical Potentials

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality and Robot Therapy as Recent Rehabilitation Technologies Using EEG-Brain-Computer Interface Based on Movement-Related Cortical Potentials

Ramadhan Rashid Said et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

To enhance the treatment of motor function impairment, patients' brain signals for self-control as an external tool may be an extraordinarily hopeful option. For the past 10 years, researchers and clinicians in the brain-computer interface (BCI) field have been using movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) as a control signal in neurorehabilitation applications to induce plasticity by monitoring the intention of action and feedback. Here, we reviewed the research on robot therapy (RT) and virtual reality (VR)-MRCP-based BCI rehabilitation technologies as recent advancements in human healthcare. A list of 18 full-text studies suitable for qualitative review out of 322 articles published between 2000 and 2022 was identified based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. We used PRISMA guidelines for the systematic review, while the PEDro scale was used for quality evaluation. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using the VOSviewer software to identify the relationship and trends of key items. In this review, 4 studies used VR-MRCP, while 14 used RT-MRCP-based BCI neurorehabilitation approaches. The total number of subjects in all identified studies was 107, whereby 4.375 ± 6.3627 were patient subjects and 6.5455 ± 3.0855 were healthy subjects. The type of electrodes, the epoch, classifiers, and the performance information that are being used in the RT- and VR-MRCP-based BCI rehabilitation application are provided in this review. Furthermore, this review also describes the challenges facing this field, solutions, and future directions of these smart human health rehabilitation technologies. By key items relationship and trends analysis, we found that motor control, rehabilitation, and upper limb are important key items in the MRCP-based BCI field. Despite the potential of these rehabilitation technologies, there is a great scarcity of literature related to RT and VR-MRCP-based BCI. However, the information on these rehabilitation methods can be beneficial in developing RT and VR-MRCP-based BCI rehabilitation devices to induce brain plasticity and restore motor impairment. Therefore, this review will provide the basis and references of the MRCP-based BCI used in rehabilitation applications for further clinical and research development.

Keywords: biomedical signal; brain–computer interface; electroencephalography; human healthcare; machine learning; neurological diseases; robot therapy; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
A VR-MRCP-based BCI neurorehabilitation device [47].
Figure 1
Figure 1
General schematic representation of RT and VR-MRCP-based BCI systems from signal acquisition and signal processing to application in either VR or RT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PRISMA flowchart of the present study.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overlay visualization of key items coincident analysis. The map was constructed by VOSViewer software from the identified 18 studies. The incidences of each key item determined the size of the circle. The colors of the circles indicated the score of the key item since publication according to the color scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raggi A., Monasta L., Beghi E., Caso V., Castelpietra G., Mondello S., Giussani G., Logroscino G., Magnani F.G., Piccininni M., et al. Incidence, Prevalence and Disability Associated with Neurological Disorders in Italy between 1990 and 2019: An Analysis Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J. Neurol. 2022;269:2080–2098. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10774-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin E.J., Muntner P., Alonso A., Bittencourt M.S., Callaway C.W., Carson A.P., Chamberlain A.M., Chang A.R., Cheng S., Das S.R., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e56–e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators Global, Regional, and National Burden of Neurological Disorders, 1990-2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. Neurol. 2019;18:459–480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatem S.M., Saussez G., della Faille M., Prist V., Zhang X., Dispa D., Bleyenheuft Y. Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016;10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Y., Yang Z., Chen X., Yuan H., Liu W. A Stacking Model Using URL and HTML Features for Phishing Webpage Detection. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019;94:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.11.004. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources