Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 25;12(12):1616.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121616.

Acute Effects of High-Frequency Insular Stimulation on Interictal Epileptiform Discharge Rates in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy

Affiliations

Acute Effects of High-Frequency Insular Stimulation on Interictal Epileptiform Discharge Rates in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy

Thi Phuoc Yen Tran et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of several sites, such as the thalamus, has been shown to reduce seizure frequency and interictal epileptiform activity in patients with refractory epilepsy. Recent findings have demonstrated that the insula is part of the ‘rich club’ of highly connected brain regions. This pilot study investigated short-term effects of high-frequency (HF) insular DBS on interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) rate in patients with refractory epilepsy. Methods: Six patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing an intracranial electroencephalographic study received two sets of 10 min continuous 150 Hz HF-DBS of the insula. For each patient, epileptiform activity was analyzed for a total of 80 min, starting 20 min prior to stimulation set 1 (S1), and ending 20 min after stimulation set 2 (S2). All IEDs were identified and classified according to their anatomic localization by a board-certified epileptologist. The IED rate during the 20 min preceding S1 served as a baseline for comparison with IED rate during S1, S2 and post-stimulation periods. Results: HF-DBS of the anterior insula (aINS) was performed in a patient with an aINS epileptic focus (patient 1). HF-DBS of the posterior insula (pINS) was performed in two patients with a pINS epileptic focus (patients 2 and 4), in one patient with an aINS focus (patient 3), and in two non-insular patients (patients 5 and 6). The total IED (irrespective of their location) rate significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in two patients (patients 1 and 2) during the stimulation period, whereas it significantly increased (p < 0.01) in one patient (patient 6); there was no change in the other three patients. Looking at subsets of spike localization, HF-DBS of the aINS significantly reduced aINS and orbitofrontal IEDs in patient 1 (p < 0.01), while HF-DBS of the pINS had an effect on pINS IEDs (p < 0.01) in both patients with a pINS focus; there was no significant effect of HF-DBS of the insula on IEDs in temporal or other frontal regions. Conclusion: Short-term HF-DBS of the insula had heterogeneous effects on the IED rate. Further work is required to examine factors underlying these heterogeneous effects, such as stimulation frequency, location of IEDs and subregions of the insula stimulated.

Keywords: deep brain stimulation; high-frequency stimulation; insular epilepsy; interictal epileptiform discharge frequency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intracranial EEG recording during baseline (A), the beginning of the first stimulation (B), the late phase of the first stimulation (C), and the first post-stimulation period (D) in patient 1. The green vertical lines indicate marked spikes seen at the junction of the orbitofrontal operculum (F45 > F46) and the anterior insula (U21, U22, U23). High-frequency stimulation was performed over U41-U42 anterior insular contacts (red rectangle). At the beginning of the stimulation, orbitofrontal and orbitofrontal operculum–anterior insular spikes disappeared (B), then gradually reappeared (C). These interictal epileptiform discharges continued abundantly during the post-stimulation period (D). Filters (high-pass = 1 Hz, low-pass = 70 Hz) were set only for illustrative purposes. SFG = superior frontal gyrus; aINS = anterior insula; Orbito-F = orbitofrontal; MF = medial frontal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 3-D representations of each patient’s brain with icEEG recording sites and location of the insular site of stimulation (small red cross) on the sagittal, axial, and coronal T1-weighted MRI cuts. The stimulation site was in the anterior insula in patient 1 (A) and in the posterior insula in the others ((BF) was for patients 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of total IEDs (irrespective of localization) every minute during the analyzed periods for each patient. Comparisons were performed between baseline IED rate with the fist stimulation period (S1), post-stimulation period 1 (PS1), the second stimulation period (S2), and post-stimulation period 2 (PS2). ** and * indicate statistical significance at p < 0.01 and p < 0.05. X-axis: number of IEDs; Y-axis: time (in minutes). Blue, red, and green dots represent IED rates identified during baseline, stimulation and post-stimulation periods, respectively. ↓ and ↑: indicate the significant decrease and increase, respectively, in the IED rate of the studied period compared to that of the baseline.

References

    1. Li M.C.H., Cook M.J. Deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2018;59:273–290. doi: 10.1111/epi.13964. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Filipescu C., Lagarde S., Lambert I., Pizzo F., Trébuchon A., McGonigal A., Scavarda D., Carron R., Bartolomei F. The effect of medial pulvinar stimulation on temporal lobe seizures. Epilepsia. 2019;60:e25–e30. doi: 10.1111/epi.14677. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher R., Salanova V., Witt T., Worth R., Henry T., Gross R., Oommen K., Osorio I., Nazzaro J., Labar D., et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:899–908. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salanova V., Witt T., Worth R., Henry T.R., Gross R.E., Nazzaro J.M., Labar D., Sperling M.R., Sharan A., Sandok E., et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015;84:1017–1025. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalic L.J., Warren A.E.L., Bulluss K.J., Thevathasan W., Roten A., Churilov L., Archer J.S. DBS of Thalamic Centromedian Nucleus for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (ESTEL Trial) Ann. Neurol. 2022;91:253–267. doi: 10.1002/ana.26280. - DOI - PubMed