Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):1678.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121678.

Innovative Technologies in the Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Innovative Technologies in the Neurorehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

Mirjam Bonanno et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Motor and cognitive rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a growing field of clinical and research interest. In fact, novel rehabilitative approaches allow a very early verticalization and gait training through robotic devices and other innovative tools boosting neuroplasticity, thanks to the high-intensity, repetitive and task-oriented training. In the same way, cognitive rehabilitation is also evolving towards advanced interventions using virtual reality (VR), computer-based approaches, telerehabilitation and neuromodulation devices. This review aimed to systematically investigate the existing evidence concerning the role of innovative technologies in the motor and cognitive neurorehabilitation of TBI patients. We searched and reviewed the studies published in the Cochrane Library, PEDro, PubMed and Scopus between January 2012 and September 2022. After an accurate screening, only 29 papers were included in this review. This systematic review has demonstrated the beneficial role of innovative technologies when applied to cognitive rehabilitation in patients with TBI, while evidence of their effect on motor rehabilitation in this patient population is poor and still controversial.

Keywords: innovations in neurorehabilitation; robotic device; traumatic brain injury; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dewan M.C., Rattani A., Gupta S., Baticulon R.E., Hung Y.C., Punchak M., Agrawal A., Adeleye A.O., Shrime M.G., Rubiano A.M., et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 2019;130:1080–1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mckee A.C., Daneshvar D.H. The neuropathology of traumatic brain injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2015;127:45–66. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00004-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pavlovic D., Pekic S., Stojanovic M., Popovic V. Traumatic brain injury: Neuropathological, neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae. Pituitary. 2019;22:270–282. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-00957-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Luca R., Calabrò R.S., Bramanti P. Cognitive rehabilitation after severe acquired brain injury: Current evidence and future directions. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2018;28:879–898. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1211937. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bland D.C., Zampieri C., Damiano D.L. Effectiveness of physical therapy for improving gait and balance in individuals with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Inj. 2011;25:664–679. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.576306. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources