Cryolipolysis on More than One Body Area Increases Lipid Peroxidation without Changing Lipid Profile and Inflammatory Markers
- PMID: 36552200
- PMCID: PMC9774456
- DOI: 10.3390/biology11121690
Cryolipolysis on More than One Body Area Increases Lipid Peroxidation without Changing Lipid Profile and Inflammatory Markers
Abstract
In the present study, the effects of cryolipolysis on one and multiple body areas, assessing body composition, lipid profile and peroxidation and inflammatory markers were investigated. Twenty-four women aged between 20 and 59 years were randomly assigned to three groups: (1) control, (2) cryolipolysis on the abdomen and (3) cryolipolysis on the abdomen + flanks. Anthropometric measurements, bioimpedance and ultrasound were performed, as well serum lipid profile, lipid peroxidation markers (malondialdehyde and myeloperoxidase) and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and Interleukin-1β) were determined. In addition, food consumption and physical activity level were evaluated. Data were obtained at 0, 10 and 30 days (t0, t10 and t30) after cryolipolysis. Cryolipolysis did not change anthropometric measurements, body composition or lipid profile. Interestingly, the abdomen + flanks group had significantly increased plasma myeloperoxidase activity at t0, t10 and t30, and increased malondialdehyde levels at t0 and t10 when compared to the other groups. Furthermore, there were no differences between macronutrient intake and total energy value, physical activity level, malondialdehyde and interleukin-1β at t30. Cryolipolysis did not change body composition, lipid profile or inflammatory markers investigated. On the other hand, when used on the abdomen and flanks, it produced an increase in lipid peroxidation markers, malondialdehyde and myeloperoxidase.
Keywords: adipose tissue; body composition; cryolipolysis; inflammation; oxidative stress; subcutaneous fat.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Contrast Cryolipolysis for Subcutaneous-Fat Reduction.Dermatol Res Pract. 2018 Nov 29;2018:5276528. doi: 10.1155/2018/5276528. eCollection 2018. Dermatol Res Pract. 2018. PMID: 30631345 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests.Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Sep;49(7):640-644. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22674. Epub 2017 May 2. Lasers Surg Med. 2017. PMID: 28464272 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High Participant Satisfaction Achieved Using Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction of the Abdomen and Flanks.Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Jun 20;42(7):760-770. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab421. Aesthet Surg J. 2022. PMID: 34919631 Free PMC article.
-
Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014 Jun 26;7:201-5. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S44371. eCollection 2014. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 25061326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Simple obesity in children. A study on the role of nutritional factors].Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):3-191. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2006. PMID: 16733288 Review. Polish.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials