Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):3173.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123173.

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Filippo Benedetto  1 , Domenico Spinelli  1 , Francesco La Corte  1 , Narayana Pipitò  1 , Gabriele Passari  1 , Giovanni De Caridi  1
Affiliations

Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Follow-Up after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Filippo Benedetto et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows a false negative rate close to zero and therefore is suitable as the main non-invasive follow-up strategy for long-term monitoring after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Methods: We included all consecutive patients who underwent CEUS as follow-up after EVAR at our center between January 2017 and December 2021.The follow-up protocol consisted of Duplex ultrasound (DUS) with CEUS at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively and every 6 months thereafter. Results: A total of 125 patients underwent 228 CEUS. The aneurysm sac showed shrinkage in 80 (64%) patients, stability in 32 (25.6%), and enlargement in 13 (10.4%). A total of 29 (23.2%) patients showed type 2 endoleak, 6 (4.8%) patients showed type 1 endoleak and 3 (2.4%) patients showed type 3 endoleak. Thirteen patients underwent one or more reinterventions. The sensitivity of CEUS vs. DUS was 100% vs. 75% (p > 0.0001). In classifying type 2 endoleak, CEUS compared to DUS showed a sensitivity of 93.2% vs. 59.4% and a specificity of 99.3% vs. 99.3%. CEUS showed a higher sensitivity compared to DUS in the detection of type 2 endoleak. CEUS permits the identification of a subset of patients requiring a stricter follow-up protocol.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; duplex ultrasound; endoleak; follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Initial control phase of EVAR with CEUS (c) and DUS (t). Normal perfusion endoprosthesis and no T2EL detected (c).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tardive control phase of EVAR with CEUS (c) and DUS (t). Evidence of T2EL with low washout (c).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evidence of T2EL with CEUS (c) and DUS (t).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evidence of T1EL type A with CEUS (c) and DUS (t).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Evidence of T1EL type B with CEUS (c) and DUS (t).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lederle F.A., Freischlag J.A., Kyriakides T.C., Matsumura J.S., Padberg F.T., Jr., Kohler T.R., Kougias P., Jean-Claude J.M., Cikrit D.F., Swanson K.M. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1988–1997. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel R., Sweeting M.J., Powell J.T., Greenhalgh R.M., EVAR trial investigators Endovascular versus openrepair of ab-dominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2366–2374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wanhainen A., Verzini F., Van Herzeele I., Allaire E., Bown M., Cohnert T., Dick F., van Herwaarden J., Karkos C., Koelemay M., et al. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Managementof Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2019;57:8–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaikof E.L., Dalman R.L., Eskandari M.K., Jackson B.M., Lee W.A., Mansour M.A., Mastracci T.M., Mell M., Murad M.H., Nguyen L.L., et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018;67:2–77.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pratesi C., Esposito D., Apostolou D., Attisani L., Bellosta R., Benedetto F., Blangetti I., Bonardelli S., Casini A., Fargion A.T., et al. Italian Guidelines for Vascular Surgery Collaborators—Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE) AAA Group J. Cardiovasc. Surg. (Torino) 2022;63:328–352. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12330-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources