Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Nov 30;13(12):2257.
doi: 10.3390/genes13122257.

Whole-Chromosome Karyotyping of Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells Using the Ion Proton Sequencing Platform

Affiliations
Case Reports

Whole-Chromosome Karyotyping of Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells Using the Ion Proton Sequencing Platform

Angela N Barrett et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

The current gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy uses either chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis, both of which are which are invasive procedures carrying a procedure-related risk of miscarriage of up to 0.1-0.2%. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis using fetal nucleated red blood cells (FNRBCs) isolated from maternal peripheral venous blood would remove this risk of miscarriage since these cells can be isolated from the mother's blood. We aimed to detect whole-chromosome aneuploidies from single nucleated fetal red blood cells using whole-genome amplification followed by massively parallel sequencing performed on a semiconductor sequencing platform. Twenty-six single cells were picked from the placental villi of twelve patients thought to have a normal fetal genotype and who were undergoing elective first-trimester surgical termination of pregnancy. Following karyotyping, it was subsequently found that two of these cases were also abnormal (one trisomy 15 and one mosaic genotype). One single cell from chorionic villus samples for two patients carrying a fetus with trisomy 21 and two single cells from women carrying fetuses with T18 were also picked. Pooled libraries were sequenced on the Ion Proton and data were analysed using Ion Reporter software. We correctly classified fetal genotype in all 24 normal cells, as well as the 2 T21 cells, the 2 T18 cells, and the two T15 cells. The two cells picked from the fetus with a mosaic result by CVS were classified as unaffected, suggesting that this was a case of confined placental mosaicism. Fetal sex was correctly assigned in all cases. We demonstrated that semiconductor sequencing using commercially available software for data analysis can be achieved for the non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of whole-chromosome aneuploidy with 100% accuracy.

Keywords: aneuploidy; cell based; fetal erythroblast; non-invasive prenatal diagnosis; semiconductor sequencing; single-cell whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The National University of Singapore has licensed a patent out to INEX Innovate Pte Ltd. MC holds shares in and is a nonexecutive director for INEX Innovate Pte Ltd.; AB is on the scientific advisory board; and SSYH and SA are employees of iGene Laboratory Pte Ltd., which is a subsidiary of INEX Innovate Pte Ltd. No financial benefit was associated with the conduct of this study. None of the other authors have conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative whole-genome plots for different whole-chromosome copy number analyses or genotyping from single FNRBCs. Normal genotypes obtained for single cells from (a) a normal male fetus and (b) a normal female. Aneuploid cells were tested from (c) a T21 female, (d) a T18 female, and (e) a T15 male; all showed the expected chromosomal gains with low signal noise for the normal chromosomes. (f) A single cell from a normal male fetus in a patient with confined placental mosaicism (CPM). Two cells from post-TOP maternal blood: (g) a normal female fetus and (h) a normal male. Aneuploidies are indicated by a blue bar. MAPD values are indicated for each sample, acting as a sample quality metric. Values above 0.3 are unacceptable.

References

    1. Tan T. Combined first trimester screen or noninvasive prenatal testing or both. Singap. Med. J. 2015;56:1–3. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gadsbøll K., Petersen O.B., Gatinois V., Strange H., Jacobsson B., Wapner R., Vermeesch J.R., Vogel I. Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020;99:722–730. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13841. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van der Meij K.R.M., Sistermans E.A., Macville M.V., Stevens S.J., Bax C.J., Bekker M.N., Bilardo C.M., Boon E.M., Boter M., Diderich K.E., et al. TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2019;105:1091–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicolaides K.H. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat. Diagn. 2011;31:7–15. doi: 10.1002/pd.2637. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kagan K.O., Maier V., Sonek J., Abele H., Lüthgens K., Schmid M., Wagner P., Hoopmann M. False-Positive Rate in First-Trimester Screening Based on Ultrasound and Cell-Free DNA versus First-Trimester Combined Screening with Additional Ultrasound Markers. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2019;45:317–324. doi: 10.1159/000489121. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types