A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
- PMID: 36553957
- PMCID: PMC9778157
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122433
A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42-50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6-29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible.
Keywords: colorectal cancer; implementation of liver surgery; liver metastasis; minimally invasive surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer with liver metastasis: a comparison with open surgery.Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1422-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5826-0. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29075971
-
Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes.Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):842-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc789c. Ann Surg. 2009. PMID: 19806058
-
Is minimally invasive surgery of lesions in the right superior segments of the liver justified? A multi-institutional study of 245 patients.J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;122(7):1428-1434. doi: 10.1002/jso.26154. Epub 2020 Aug 16. J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33459363 Free PMC article.
-
Mini-invasive vs open resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 14;25(22):2819-2832. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2819. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31236004 Free PMC article.
-
The role of liver surgery in simultaneous synchronous colorectal liver metastases and colorectal cancer resections: a literature review of 1730 patients underwent open and minimally invasive surgery.Minerva Surg. 2022 Dec;77(6):582-590. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.22.09716-7. Minerva Surg. 2022. PMID: 36409039 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparative meta-analysis and systematic review of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic hemihepatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 9;19(1):469. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02464-5. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40782131 Review.
References
-
- Bonjer H.J., Deijen C.L., Abis G.A., Cuesta M.A., van der Pas M.H.G.M., de Lange-de Klerk E.S.M., Lacy A.M., Bemelman W.A., Andersson J., Angenete E., et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372:1324–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources