Impact of Two Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation during the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial
- PMID: 36553975
- PMCID: PMC9777645
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122451
Impact of Two Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation during the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial
Erratum in
-
Correction: Suppan et al. Impact of Two Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation during the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2451.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;11(12):1799. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121799. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372928 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation regularly publishes a Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations, but guidelines can nevertheless differ when knowledge gaps persist. In case of pediatric cardiac arrest, the American Heart Association recommends following the adult resuscitation sequence, i.e., starting with chest compressions. Conversely, the European Resuscitation Council advocates the delivery of five initial rescue breaths before starting chest compressions. This was a superiority, randomized cross-over trial designed to determine the impact of these two resuscitation sequences on alveolar ventilation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was alveolar ventilation during the first minute of resuscitation maneuvers according to the guidelines used. A total of 56 resuscitation sequences were recorded (four sequences per team of two participants). The ERC approach enabled higher alveolar ventilation volumes (370 mL [203−472] versus 276 mL [140−360], p < 0.001) at the cost of lower chest compression fractions (57% [54;64] vs. 66% [59;68], p < 0.001). Although statistically significant, the differences found in this simulation study may not be clinically relevant. Therefore, and because of the importance of overcoming barriers to resuscitation, advocating a pediatric-specific resuscitation algorithm may not be an appropriate strategy.
Keywords: alveolar ventilation; bag-valve-mask ventilation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; chest compression fraction; paramedics; pediatric cardiac arrest; randomized trial; simulation study; study protocol.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Bag-Valve-Mask versus Laryngeal Mask Airway Ventilation in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Compressions: A Simulation Study.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Apr;36(2):189-194. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000054. Epub 2021 Feb 1. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021. PMID: 33517953 Clinical Trial.
-
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e989-1004. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0219. Pediatrics. 2006. PMID: 16651298
-
2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Pediatric Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000540. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29114009 Review.
-
A Cross-Over Trial Comparing Conventional to Compression-Adjusted Ventilations with Metronome-Guided Compressions.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Apr;34(2):220-223. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19000098. Epub 2019 Apr 10. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019. PMID: 30968816
-
[The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].Anaesthesist. 2006 Sep;55(9):958-66, 968-72, 974-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1064-x. Anaesthesist. 2006. PMID: 16915404 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Effect of Intermediate Airway Management on Ventilation Parameters in Simulated Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial.Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;10(1):148. doi: 10.3390/children10010148. Children (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36670698 Free PMC article.
-
Correction: Suppan et al. Impact of Two Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation during the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2451.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;11(12):1799. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121799. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372928 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Topjian A.A., Raymond T.T., Atkins D., Chan M., Duff J.P., Joyner B.L., Lasa J.J., Lavonas E.J., Levy A., Mahgoub M., et al. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142:S469–S523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wyckoff M.H., Singletary E.M., Soar J., Olasveengen T.M., Greif R., Liley H.G., Zideman D., Bhanji F., Andersen L.W., Avis S.R., et al. 2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2021;169:229–311. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical