Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 10;10(12):2499.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122499.

Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring

Affiliations

Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring

Joaquim Paulo Antunes et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p < 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p < 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p < 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.

Keywords: Clean and Jerk; Olympic exercises; Power Clean; Snatch; Squat; load monitoring; power; weightlifting derivatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Testing protocol schematic.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garhammer J. A Review of power output studies of olympic and powerlifting: Methodology, performance prediction, and evaluation tests. J. Strength Cond. Res. 1993;7:76–89. doi: 10.1519/00124278-199305000-00002. - DOI
    1. Garhammer J., Mclaughlin T. Power output as a function of load variation in olympic and power lifting. J. Biomech. 1980;13:198. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90222-5. - DOI
    1. Derwin B.P. Sports Performance Series: The Snatch: Technical description and periodization program. Strength Cond. J. 1990;12:6–15. doi: 10.1519/0744-0049(1990)012<0006:TSTDAP>2.3.CO;2. - DOI
    1. Al-Khleifat A.I., Al-Kilani M., Kilani H.A. Biomechanics of the clean and jerk in weightlifting national Jordanian team; Proceedings of the Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019, Summer Conferences of Sports Science; Budapest, Hungary. 11–13 September 2019; - DOI
    1. Grabe S., Widule C. Comparative biomechanics of the jerk in olympic weightlifting. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 1988;59:1–8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1988.10605466. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources