Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring
- PMID: 36554023
- PMCID: PMC9777922
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122499
Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring
Abstract
Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p < 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p < 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p < 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.
Keywords: Clean and Jerk; Olympic exercises; Power Clean; Snatch; Squat; load monitoring; power; weightlifting derivatives.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of successful and unsuccessful snatch and clean and jerk lifts in IWF World Championships (2011-2023).Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 14;14(1):28076. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79752-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39543189 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Foundation Strength and Weightlifting Exercises in Highly Trained Weightlifters: Support for a General Strength Component.J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jul 1;37(7):1375-1381. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004433. Epub 2023 Jan 18. J Strength Cond Res. 2023. PMID: 36728004
-
Effects of Expertise on Muscle Activity during the Hang Power Clean and Hang Power Snatch Compared to Snatch and Clean Pulls - An Explorative Analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Dec 1;22(4):778-789. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.778. eCollection 2023 Dec. J Sports Sci Med. 2023. PMID: 38045750 Free PMC article.
-
Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.Sports Med. 2015 Jun;45(6):823-39. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0314-y. Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 25689955 Review.
-
Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.Sports Med. 2012 Sep 1;42(9):769-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03262294. Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22873835 Review.
Cited by
-
Should We Use the Men Load-Velocity Profile for Women in Deadlift and Hip Thrust?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064888. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36981796 Free PMC article.
-
Load Monitoring and Its Relationship with Healthcare in Sports.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;11(16):2330. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162330. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37628527 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Garhammer J. A Review of power output studies of olympic and powerlifting: Methodology, performance prediction, and evaluation tests. J. Strength Cond. Res. 1993;7:76–89. doi: 10.1519/00124278-199305000-00002. - DOI
-
- Garhammer J., Mclaughlin T. Power output as a function of load variation in olympic and power lifting. J. Biomech. 1980;13:198. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90222-5. - DOI
-
- Al-Khleifat A.I., Al-Kilani M., Kilani H.A. Biomechanics of the clean and jerk in weightlifting national Jordanian team; Proceedings of the Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 2019, Summer Conferences of Sports Science; Budapest, Hungary. 11–13 September 2019; - DOI
-
- Grabe S., Widule C. Comparative biomechanics of the jerk in olympic weightlifting. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 1988;59:1–8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1988.10605466. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources