Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 8;11(24):7297.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11247297.

Stepwise Reduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil with Conversion to Everolimus for the Treatment of Active BKV in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience in Vietnam

Affiliations

Stepwise Reduction of Mycophenolate Mofetil with Conversion to Everolimus for the Treatment of Active BKV in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience in Vietnam

Truong Quy Kien et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: No specific antiviral drug can effectively treat BKV reactivation after kidney transplantation. Thus, we evaluated stepwise-reduced immunosuppression to treat BKV reactivation. Methods: 341 kidney-transplant recipients were monitored for BKV infection (BKV-viremia, BKV-viruria). Positive samples with a significant virus load were nested PCR-genotyped in the VP1 region. In 97/211 patients presenting BKV viremia ≥104 copies/mL and/or BKV viruria ≥107 copies/mL, or BKV-nephropathy immunosuppression (i.e., mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) was reduced by 50%. If viral load did not decrease within 28 days, MMF dose was further reduced by 25%, although calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) therapy remained unchanged. If BKV viral load did not decrease within another 28 days, MMF was withdrawn and replaced by everolimus combined with reduced CNIs. Results: Only 41/97 BKV (+) cases completed the 6-month follow-up. Among these, 29 (71%) were in the BKV-I group and 12 (29%) were in BKV-IV. BKV viruria and BKV viremia were significantly decreased from 9.32 to 6.09 log10 copies/mL, and from 3.59 to 2.45 log10 copies/mL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). 11/32 (34.4%) patients were cleared of BKV viremia; 2/32 (6.3%) patients were cleared of BKV in both serum and urine, and 9/9 (100%) only had BKV viruria but did not develop BKV viremia. eGFR remained stable. No patient with BKV-related nephropathy had graft loss. There was a significant inverse relationship between changes in eGFR and serum BKV load (r = −0.314, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This stepwise immunosuppressive strategy proved effective at reducing BKV viral load in kidney transplant recipients that had high BKV loads in serum and/or urine. Renal function remained stable without rejection.

Keywords: BK polyomavirus; BKV genotypes; Vietnam; everolimus; immunosuppression; kidney transplantation; renal allograft rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NJ phylogenetic tree clustering of 29 BKV-I and 12 BKV-IV polyomavirus sequences to determine subgroups (n = 41).
Figure 3
Figure 3
BKV viremia and BKV viruria titers during the 6-month follow-up period in 41 patients who completed follow-up time (p = 0.024 for serum; p < 0.001 for urine; both ANOVA for repeated measures).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between changes in eGFR and changes in BKV viremia (n = 41 KTx patients); r = −0.314; p = 0.04.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cyclosporine and tacrolimus trough levels during the 6-month follow-up period in 41 KTx patients with BKV infection.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Changes in eGFR during the 6-month follow-up period in 41 KTx patients with BKV infection with p = 0.855 for the whole group (n = 41), p = 0.695 for the BKV group (n = 35), and p = 0.884 for the BKVN (n = 6).

References

    1. Gardner S.D., Field A.M., Coleman D.V., Hulme B. New human papovavirus (B.K.) isolated from urine after renal transplantation. Lancet. 1971;1:1253–1257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)91776-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Comerlato J., Campos F.S., Oliveira M.T., Cibulski S.P., Corrêa L., Kulmann M.I., Arantes T.S., Hentges L.P., Spilki F.R., Roehe P.M., et al. Molecular detection and characterization of BK and JC polyomaviruses in urine samples of renal transplant patients in Southern Brazil. J. Med. Virol. 2015;87:522–528. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon S.H., Cho J.H., Jung H.Y., Choi J.Y., Park S.H., Kim Y.L., Kim H.K., Huh S., Kim C.D. Clinical impact of BK virus surveillance on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Proc. 2015;47:660–665. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.11.051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma R., Zachariah M. BK Virus Nephropathy: Prevalence, Impact and Management Strategies. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2020;13:187–192. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S236556. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borriello M., Ingrosso D., Perna A.F., Lombardi A., Maggi P., Altucci L., Caraglia M. BK Virus Infection and BK-Virus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients. Genes. 2022;13:1290. doi: 10.3390/genes13071290. - DOI - PMC - PubMed