Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 14;11(24):7416.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11247416.

Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Alessandra Berton et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes.

Keywords: glenoid version; humeral version; muscle forces; range of motion; reverse prosthesis; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the screening selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias [17,18,19,20,25,26,27,28,29,30].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Best M.J., Aziz K.T., Wilckens J.H., McFarland E.G., Srikumaran U. Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30:1159–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Longo U.G., Papalia R., Castagna A., De Salvatore S., Guerra E., Piergentili I., Denaro V. Shoulder replacement: An epidemiological nationwide study from 2009 to 2019. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2022;23:889. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05849-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guery J., Favard L., Sirveaux F., Oudet D., Mole D., Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2006;88:1742–1747. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200608000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wall B., Nove-Josserand L., O’Connor D.P., Edwards T.B., Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A review of results according to etiology. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2007;89:1476–1485. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00666. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrillo S., Longo U.G., Gulotta L.V., Berton A., Kontaxis A., Wright T., Denaro V. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Research models. Joints. 2016;4:236–246. doi: 10.11138/jts/2016.4.4.236. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources