Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 10;12(12):2044.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12122044.

Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Kaitlyn V Davis et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings.

Keywords: cancer screening tests; early detection of cancer; liquid biopsy; multi-cancer early detection; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

As noted in the Funding Statement, support for the research presented in this manuscript was provided by Exact Sciences and the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. No other relevant conflicts of interest exist for any of the individual authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scoping review schema. This represents each step taken to complete the scoping review. The schema is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Preventive Services Taskforce Recommendation: Lung Cancer: Screening. [(accessed on 29 December 2021)]. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/index.php/recommend....
    1. United States Preventive Services Taskforce Recommendation: Cervical Cancer: Screening. [(accessed on 11 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/cerv....
    1. United States Preventive Services Taskforce Recommendation: Colorectal Cancer: Screening. [(accessed on 11 January 2022)]. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colo....

Publication types