Urologic Complication after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Gynecology Oncology: A Single-Center Analysis and Narrative Review of the Literature
- PMID: 36557071
- PMCID: PMC9782160
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121869
Urologic Complication after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Gynecology Oncology: A Single-Center Analysis and Narrative Review of the Literature
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has recently increased its application in the treatment of gynecological malignancies. Despite technological and surgical advances, urologic complications (UC) are still the main concern in gynecology surgery. Current literature reports a wide range of urinary tract injuries, and consistent scientific evidence is still lacking or dated. This study aims to report a large single-center experience of urinary complications during laparoscopic hysterectomy for gynecologic oncologic disease. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy at the Department of Medicine and Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively included. Women with endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine sarcoma, or borderline ovarian tumors were included. Patients undergoing robotic surgery with incomplete anatomopathological data or patients lost during follow-up were excluded from the analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative UC were analyzed and ranked according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Two hundred-sixty patients were included in the study: 180 endometrial cancer, 18 cervical cancer, nine ovarian cancer, two uterine sarcomas, and 60 borderline ovarian tumors. Nine (3.5%) UCs were reported (five intraoperative and four postoperative complications). No anamnestic variables showed a statistical correlation with the surgical complication in the univariable analyses. C1 radical hysterectomy, a higher FIGO stage, and postoperative adjuvant treatment (p-value = 0.001, p-value = 0.046, and p-value = 0.046, respectively) were independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of UC. Conclusions: The urological complication rates in patients with oncological disease are relatively rare events in the expert hands of dedicated surgeons. Radical hysterectomy, FIGO stage, and adjuvant treatment are independent factors associated with urinary complications.
Keywords: gynecologic oncology; hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; urologic complications.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074405 Free PMC article.
-
Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):816-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715304
-
Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: modified radical hysterectomy in intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer using peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery.World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 16;11:198. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-198. World J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23947937 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):249.e1-249.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31586602 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253143. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34197466 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
OS and DFS are affected by different diagnostic methods and hysterectomy procedures in endometrial cancer patients: A single-center retrospective study.Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19072-19080. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6465. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37584224 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical implications of the superficial uterine vein pattern for the dissection of the anterior layer of the vesicouterine ligament in radical hysterectomy.J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Jul;35(4):e50. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e50. Epub 2024 Jan 22. J Gynecol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38282260 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Urinary Tract Injuries in Gynecological Surgery: Current Insights and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151780. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40805813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Editorial: Updates in urogynecological surgery.Front Surg. 2024 Feb 5;11:1363416. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1363416. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 38375410 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 29;14(3):265. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030265. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38541007 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Capozzi V.A., Sozzi G., Gambino G., Cianciolo A., Monfardini L., Gaiano M., Chiantera V., Uccella S., Berretta R. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical treatment of obese women with endometrial cancer: A cost-benefit comparative analysis. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2019;11:335–342. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1901. - DOI - PMC - PubMed