Environmental, Economic, and Social Aspects of Human Urine Valorization through Microbial Fuel Cells from the Circular Economy Perspective
- PMID: 36557539
- PMCID: PMC9785870
- DOI: 10.3390/mi13122239
Environmental, Economic, and Social Aspects of Human Urine Valorization through Microbial Fuel Cells from the Circular Economy Perspective
Abstract
Population growth increases the challenge of meeting basic human needs, such as water, a limited resource. Consumption habits and water pollution have compromised natural resources to unsustainable levels. Sustainable effluent treatment practices, such as decentralized systems focused on energy, nutrients, and water recovery, have attracted the attention of the scientific community. Human urine (HU) is a physiological liquid waste whose main component is water (~95%). HU has a significant amount of nutrients, such as N, P, K, and organic matter, which are usually lacking in fecal coliforms. Therefore, the possibility exists of recovering nutrients and energy from HU using sustainable and non-sustainable technologies. Treating HU in bioelectrochemical systems (BES) is a novel alternative to obtaining byproducts from this effluent more sustainably than in electrochemical systems. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are an interesting example, contributing to HU revalorization from unwanted waste into a valuable resource of nutrients, energy, and water. Even when urine-operated MFCs have not generated attractive potential outputs or produced considerable amounts of bioelectricity, this review emphasizes HU advantages as nutrients or water sources. The aim of this review was to analyze the current development of BES for HU treatment based on the water circular economy, discussing challenges and perspectives researchers might encounter.
Keywords: bioelectrochemical systems; circular economy; electrochemical systems; human urine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Salminen J., Määttä K., Haimi H., Maidell M., Karjalainen A., Noro K., Koskiaho J., Tikkanen S., Pohjola J. Water-smart circular economy—Conceptualisation, transitional policy instruments and stakeholder perception. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;334:130065. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130065. - DOI
-
- Sánchez-Montoya G., Talavera-Mendoza O., Hernández-Flores G., Díaz-Villaseñor E., Ramírez-Guzmán A.H., Galarza-Brito Z. Rev. Potentially toxic elements determination and chemical-microbiological analysis of potable water in Taxco de Alarcón, Guerrero. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Geol. 2019;36:147–158. doi: 10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2019.2.927. - DOI
-
- Xuexiu J., Jiří J.K., Sharifah Rafidah W.A., Petar S.V. Regional Water Resources Assessment using Water Scarcity Pinch Analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020;157:104749. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104749. - DOI
-
- Voulvoulis N. Water reuse from a circular economy perspective and potential risks from an unregulated approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health. 2018;2:32–45. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.01.005. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
