Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation
- PMID: 3655881
- DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.3.525
Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation
Abstract
1. Myoelectric (ME) activity of several motor units was detected simultaneously from the human flexor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis longus muscles, the only two muscles that control the interphalangeal joint of the thumb. The ME signals were detected while the subjects produced isometric force outputs to track three different paradigms: triangular trajectories, random-force trajectories requiring both flexion and extension contractions, and net zero force resulting from stiffening the joint by voluntarily coactivating both muscles. 2. The ME signals were decomposed into their constituent motor-unit action potential trains. The firing rate behavior of the concurrently active motor units was studied using cross-correlation techniques. 3. During isometric contractions, the firing rates of motor units within a muscle were greatly cross-correlated with essentially zero time shift with respect to each other. This observation confirms our previous report of this behavior, which has been called common drive. Common drive was also found among the motor units of the agonist and antagonist muscles during voluntary coactivation to stiffen the interphalangeal joint. This observation suggests two interesting points: 1) that the common drive mechanism has a component of central origin, and 2) that the central nervous system may control the motoneuron pools of an agonist-antagonist muscle pair as if they were one pool when both are performing the same task. 4. During force reversals, the firing rates of motor units reverse in an orderly manner: earlier recruited motor units decrease their firing rate before later recruited motor units. This orderly reversal of firing rates is consistent with the concept of orderly recruitment and derecruitment. 5. A control scheme is suggested to explain the behavior of the motor units in both muscles during force reversal. It consists of centrally mediated reciprocally organized flexion and extension commands along with a common coactivation command to both muscles. This control scheme allows for coactivation and reciprocal activation of an agonist-antagonist set. 6. The agonist-antagonist pair was observed to generate a net force in two control modalities: proportional activation and reciprocal activation. In proportional activation, the agonist-antagonist set is coactivated during either of two states: when uncertainty exists in the required task or when a compensatory force contraction is perceived to be required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Motor unit control properties in constant-force isometric contractions.J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1503-16. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.3.1503. J Neurophysiol. 1996. PMID: 8890270 Clinical Trial.
-
An examination of a potential organized motor unit firing rate and recruitment scheme of an antagonist muscle during isometric contractions.J Neurophysiol. 2021 Jun 1;125(6):2094-2106. doi: 10.1152/jn.00034.2021. Epub 2021 Apr 28. J Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33909509
-
Control scheme governing concurrently active human motor units during voluntary contractions.J Physiol. 1982 Aug;329:129-42. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014294. J Physiol. 1982. PMID: 7143247 Free PMC article.
-
AAEM minimonograph #3: motor unit recruitment.Muscle Nerve. 1991 Jun;14(6):489-502. doi: 10.1002/mus.880140602. Muscle Nerve. 1991. PMID: 1852155 Review.
-
Motor unit firing behavior in man.Keio J Med. 1994 Sep;43(3):137-42. doi: 10.2302/kjm.43.137. Keio J Med. 1994. PMID: 7967308 Review.
Cited by
-
Selective recruitment of high-threshold human motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscles.J Physiol. 1989 Feb;409:451-71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017507. J Physiol. 1989. PMID: 2585297 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation improves ipsilateral selective muscle activation in a frequency dependent manner.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0122434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122434. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25816204 Free PMC article.
-
Elbow Joint Stiffness Functional Scales Based on Hill's Muscle Model and Genetic Optimization.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;23(3):1709. doi: 10.3390/s23031709. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36772750 Free PMC article.
-
Is co-contraction responsible for the decline in maximal knee joint torque in older males?Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s11357-014-9616-5. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Age (Dordr). 2014. PMID: 24445962 Free PMC article.
-
Oscillations in motor unit discharge are reflected in the low-frequency component of rectified surface EMG and the rate of change in force.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Nov;231(3):267-76. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3689-8. Epub 2013 Sep 4. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 24002673
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources