Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov 30;10(12):2047.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122047.

Interactions between Severe Allergy and Anxiety in Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinees

Affiliations

Interactions between Severe Allergy and Anxiety in Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinees

Chiara Asperti et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

Severe drug allergy affects patient hesitancy to new treatments, posing unprecedented challenges to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaigns. We aimed to analyze the psychological profile of vaccinees with a history of severe allergy in comparison to subjects with a milder allergy history. Patients attending a dedicated vaccination setting were administered an anonymized questionnaire including clinical data and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale (score range 20−80). Patients were also asked whether being in a protected setting affected their attitude toward vaccination. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range). We enrolled 116 patients (78% women), of whom 79% had a history of drug anaphylaxis. The median state anxiety score was 36.5 (30−47.2), while the trait anxiety score was 37 (32−48). State anxiety was higher in those with severe than mild allergy [39 (32−50) vs. 30 (25−37); p < 0.001], with the highest score found in a patient with previous drug anaphylaxis (42.5 [32−51.7]). More than 50% of patients reported that being in a protected setting had lowered their anxiety. Severe allergy is associated with a higher burden of situational anxiety in the setting of vaccination without affecting patient constitutional (trait) levels of anxiety. Vaccination in dedicated facilities might overcome issues related to hesitancy and improve patients’ quality of life.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; allergy; anxiety; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) State anxiety levels according to the STAY-Y tool in SAG and MAG. (B) State anxiety levels according to the STAY-Y tool in SDR and non-SDR groups. (C) Trait anxiety levels according to the STAY-Y tool in SAG and MAG. (D) Trait anxiety levels according to the STAY-Y tool in SDR and non-SDR groups. p values are shown on each of the graphs. The dotted line represents the clinical cut-off to define relevant anxiety level (>39). Using the STAY-Y tool, we assessed the anxiety level of subjects undergoing COVID-19 vaccination. First of all, we observed that patients with severe allergy background have a higher anxiety level during vaccination (39 IQR [32–50] vs. 30 IQR [24.5–36.4]), and the difference was even more evident in subjects with previous severe drug allergy (42.5 IQR [32–51.7] vs. 32.5 IQR [28–37.7]). On the contrary, no difference was observed in their trait anxiety (usual properness toward anxiety) between SAG and MAG (37.5 IQR [32.0–48.0] vs. 37 IQR [31.7–47) or between the SDR group and the non-SDR group (40 IQR [32–49] vs. 36 IQR [31.5–46]). Of note, 39 is usually used as the cut-off to define a relevant state or trait anxiety, so it appears that MAG and non-SDR groups in the median did not have a relevant anxious state during vaccination, while both SAG and SDR groups presented with clinically relevant anxiety. SAG = severe allergy group; MAG = mild allergy group; SDR = severe drug reaction.

References

    1. Lee J.K., Vadas P. Anaphylaxis: Mechanisms and management. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2011;41:923–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03779.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Montoro J., Mullol J., Jáuregui I., Dávila I., Ferrer M., Bartra J., del Cuvillo A., Sastre J., Valero A. Stress and Allergy. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2009;19((Suppl. S1)):40–47. doi: 10.1192/s0140078900000353. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baiardini I., Gaeta F., Molinengo G.W., Braido F., Canonica G., Romano A. Quality-of-life issues in survivors to anaphylactic reactions to drugs. Allergy. 2015;70:877–879. doi: 10.1111/all.12610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altmann D.M., Boyton R.J. COVID-19 vaccination: The road ahead. Science. 2022;375:1127–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.abn1755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sokolowska M., Eiwegger T., Ollert M., Torres M.J., Barber D., Del Giacco S., Jutel M., Nadeau K.C., Palomares O., Rabin R.L., et al. EAACI statement on the diagnosis, management and prevention of severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Allergy. 2021;76:1629–1639. doi: 10.1111/all.14739. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources