Efficacy of power-driven interdental cleaning tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36562267
- PMCID: PMC9932241
- DOI: 10.1002/cre2.691
Efficacy of power-driven interdental cleaning tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of power-driven interdental cleaning tools (PDICTs) as an adjunct to tooth brushing compared to tooth brushing alone or tooth brushing combined with any other non-PDICT in terms of interproximal plaque and gingival bleeding reduction in gingivitis patients.
Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed in three databases until March 20, 2022 with the following main eligibility criteria: (1) randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with (2) at least 28 days of follow-up in (3) gingivitis patients. Interproximal plaque and bleeding values were defined as the primary outcome variables and used for pair-wise meta-analyses.
Results: Sixteen RCTs were identified including data from 1258 participants at the final evaluation. Eight studies each investigated the effect of either a liquid-based or mechanical PDICT; one of these studies tested additionally a combined liquid-based and mechanical PDICT. Tooth brushing combined with a liquid-based PDICT compared to tooth brushing alone did not result in better interproximal plaque values but in significantly lower interproximal bleeding values. Tooth brushing combined with either a liquid-based PDICT or with a mechanical PDICT compared to tooth brushing and flossing achieved comparable interproximal plaque and bleeding values. The majority of studies reporting on patient compliance/preference favored the use of a PDICT, and except for a single study, which was reporting soft tissue trauma in two subjects from improper use of a mechanical PDICT, none of the studies reported adverse events.
Conclusions: Daily use of PDICT as an adjunct to tooth brushing significantly reduces interproximal bleeding. This effect appears comparable to that of flossing, while PDICT may achieve higher patient acceptance/compliance.
Keywords: bleeding; gingivitis; interdental cleaning device; meta-analysis; plaque; systematic review.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Addy, M. , Dummer, P. M. H. , Griffiths, G. , Hicks, R. , Kingdon, A. , & Shaw, W. C. (1986). Prevalence of plaque, gingivitis and caries in 11–12‐year‐old children in South Wales. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 14, 115–118. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Periodontology . (2019). More than a quarter of U.S. adults are dishonest with dentists about how often they floss their teeth. www.perio.org
-
- Anderson, N. A. , Barnes, C. M. , Russell, C. M. , & Winchester, K. R. (1995). A clinical comparison of the efficacy of an electromechanical flossing device or manual flossing in affecting interproximal gingival bleeding and plaque accumulation. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 6, 105–107. - PubMed
-
- Barnes, C. M. , Russell, C. M. , Reinhardt, R. A. , Payne, J. B. , & Lyle, D. M. (2005). Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: Effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry, 16, 71–77. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
