Salivary Aβ1-42 may be a quick-tested biomarker for clinical use in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 36562850
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11509-w
Salivary Aβ1-42 may be a quick-tested biomarker for clinical use in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent form of dementia among the aging population. Cumulative studies aim to find non-invasive biomarkers in the early stages of AD. Saliva can be obtained easily, and salivary biomarkers have been proven effective in detecting neurodegenerative diseases. To find effective biomarkers in saliva and to help the diagnosis of AD, we performed a meta-analysis focusing on the salivary biomarkers (β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42), total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE)) in AD.
Methods: We conducted a systematic online search for eligible studies reporting data on salivary biomarkers reflecting Aβ1-42, t-tau, p-tau, and AChE in AD cohorts versus controls. Biomarkers' performance was assessed in a random-effects meta-analysis with the ratio of mean (RoM).
Results: A total of thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, of them seven involved salivary Aβ1-42 (271 AD and 489 controls), five involved salivary t-tau (324 AD and 252 controls), four involved salivary p-tau (130 AD and 161 controls), and three involved salivary AChE (81 AD and 54 controls). AD showed significantly higher salivary Aβ1-42 levels than control (ROM = 1.90 (95% CI 1.28-2.81, P = 0.001), while AD and control did not differ significantly on salivary t-tau, p-tau and AChE (ROM = 0.94, 95% CI 0.67-1.31, P = 0.72; ROM = 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.45, P = 0.68; ROM = 0.83, 95% CI 0.24-2.88, P = 0.77; respectively).
Conclusion: The pooled results provide evidence that salivary Aβ1-42 may serve as a sensitive biomarker for AD; nevertheless, larger AD cohorts are required to further confirm the sensitivity and specificity of salivary Aβ1-42 for AD diagnosis.
Keywords: Acetylcholinesterase; Alzheimer’s disease; Phosphorylated tau; Salivary biomarkers; Total tau; β-amyloid 1–42.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
Comment in
-
Electrocochleography (EcochG) for the diagnosis of cochlear endolymphatic hydrops.J Neurol. 2023 May;270(5):2789. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11571-y. Epub 2023 Jan 16. J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 36645486 No abstract available.
References
-
- Braak H, Del Tredici K (2011) The pathological process underlying Alzheimer’s disease in individuals under thirty. Acta Neuropathol 121(2):171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-010-0789-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Selkoe DJ (2001) Alzheimer’s disease results from the cerebral accumulation and cytotoxicity of amyloid beta-protein. J Alzheimers Dis 3(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2001-3111 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB et al (2018) NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 14(4):535–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Blennow K, Zetterberg H (2015) Understanding biomarkers of neurodegeneration: ultrasensitive detection techniques pave the way for mechanistic understanding. Nat Med 21(3):217–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3810 - DOI - PubMed
-
- O’Bryant SE, Gupta V, Henriksen K, Edwards M, Jeromin A, Lista S et al (2015) Guidelines for the standardization of preanalytic variables for blood-based biomarker studies in Alzheimer’s disease research. Alzheimers Dement 11(5):549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.08.099 - DOI - PubMed