Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):168.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02084-9.

Symptom clusters and impact on quality of life in esophageal cancer patients

Affiliations

Symptom clusters and impact on quality of life in esophageal cancer patients

Yanli Wang et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer patients can experience co-occurring, related symptoms labeled symptom clusters. This study aimed to identify symptom clusters and explore which SCs independently affect the quality of life (QoL) among esophageal cancer patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in Shenyang, China, from February 2021 to February 2022. Finally, 118 esophageal cancer patients effectively completed the survey. Questionnaires' information included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer Module (MDASI-GI), the Multidimensions Scale of Perceived Social Support, and demographic and clinical characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring was used to identify symptom clusters, and multiple regression analysis was employed to analyze the influencing factors of QoL.

Results: The mean score of FACT-G was 69.88 (SD = 17.85) among 118 esophageal cancer patients. Four symptom clusters were identified: psychological-somatic, dysphagia, fatigue-pain, and gastrointestinal symptom clusters. Results of regression analysis indicated a significant impact on QoL for chemotherapy (β = 0.140, P < 0.045), psychological-somatic symptom cluster (β = - 0.329, P = 0.013), and social support (β = 0.409, P < 0.001) after adjusting demographic and clinical characteristics. The linear combination explained 47.8% of the variance in QoL.

Conclusions: There is a critical need to emphasize the importance of psychological-somatic symptoms clusters management programs and increasing social support to improve QoL in esophageal cancer patients.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Quality of life; Social support; Symptoms clusters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. World Health Organization. (2020). https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table. 2021.
    1. Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, Zhang S, Zou X, Wang N, Zhang L, Tang J, Chen J, Wei K, et al. Cancer survival in China, 2003–2005: a population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(8):1921–30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y. Analysis and prediction of esophageal cancer incidence trend in China. Chin J Prev Med. 2015;46(7):593–7. - PubMed
    1. Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, Coyle N, Smart-Curley T, Kemeny N, Norton L, Hoskins W, et al. Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(3):183–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00435383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M, Kasimis BS. Symptom and quality of life survey of medical oncology patients at a veterans affairs medical center: a role for symptom assessment. Cancer. 2000;88(5):1175–83. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1175::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-N. - DOI - PubMed