Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;38(3):643-661.
doi: 10.1002/hpm.3608. Epub 2022 Dec 24.

Is clinical coordination across care levels different according to the secondary care medical speciality? Results from the Catalan health system

Daniela Campaz-Landazabal  1 , Laura Esteve-Matalí  1 , Ingrid Vargas  1 , Eric Sitjas  2 , Pere Plaja  3 , Elvira Sánchez  4 , Isabel Ramon  5 , María Luisa Vázquez  1
Affiliations

Is clinical coordination across care levels different according to the secondary care medical speciality? Results from the Catalan health system

Daniela Campaz-Landazabal et al. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Despite the scarce evidence, some studies suggest that cross-level clinical coordination may vary among secondary care (SC) doctors, influenced by their speciality and organisational model, including degree of decentralisation to primary care (PC). The aim was to determine the differences in experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination and related factors according to the SC doctor's speciality in the Catalan health system.

Methods: Cross-sectional study, based on an on-line survey using the COORDENA-CAT questionnaire, to SC doctors (n = 1666). Descriptive and multivariate analysis were used to compare five groups of SC specialities (decentralised, hospital-based, internists/geriatricians, gynaecologist, and paediatricians), for experience, perception and factors related to coordination.

Results: When comparing with decentralised specialities, hospital-based specialities and internal medicine/geriatrics reported lower care consistency and follow up across levels, while gynaecology and paediatrics, higher accessibility. General perception of cross-level coordination was lower in hospital-based specialities (PR:0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89) and higher in gynaecology (PR:1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56). Moreover, hospital-based specialities reported a lower use of some coordination mechanisms and lower knowledge of the primary care doctors (PR:0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.72), while gynaecology a higher knowledge (PR:2.04, 95% CI 1.22-3.45).

Conclusions: Results show differences in experience, perception of coordination, organisational and interactional factors across specialities. These differences may be explained by their complexity, coordination needs and organisational model. Further research is needed to clarify and understand the causes of such differences and the particular needs of coordination of each speciality to identify strategies to improve cross-level clinical coordination.

Keywords: care coordination; delivery of health care; health services research, integrated; medical specialities; secondary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Vázquez ML, Vargas I, Nuño R, Toro N. Organizaciones sanitarias integradas y otros ejemplos de colaboración entre proveedores: informe SESPAS 2012. Gac Sanit. 2012;26:94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.031
    1. Øvretveit J. Does Clinical Coordination Improve Quality and Save Money? Vol 1. The Health Foundation; 2011.
    1. Longest B, Young G. Coordination, and communication. In: Shortell S, Kaluzny A, eds. Health care management: organization design and behaviour. 4th ed. Delmar Cengage Learning; 1999:210-243.
    1. Reid R, Haggerty J, McKendry R. Defusing the Confusion: Concepts and Measures of Continuity of Healthcare. Ottawa Can Heal Serv Res Found; 2002.
    1. Henao Martínez D, Vázquez ML, Vargas I. Factores que influyen en la coordinación entre niveles asistenciales según la opinión de directivos y profesionales sanitarios. Gac Sanit. 2009;23(4):280-286.

LinkOut - more resources